Rios39
12 years ago
The texans didn't look superb against the jets. Have to keep the ball away from watts and they aren't so hot when they have to throw. Need to keep foster at bay it looks like Johnson has lost a step at wr.
blank
Zero2Cool
12 years ago 
1 	Sun 	November 21, 2004 	W 	Green Bay Packers 	@ 	Houston Texans 	16 	13 	boxscore
2 	Sun 	December 7, 2008 	L 	Green Bay Packers 		Houston Texans 	21 	24 	boxscore

37 points for
37 points against

This game tips the tide towards one team. The home has lost each of the battles! Who will win?
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
12 years ago
Cushing will be out.. the middle of that defense just became easier to run upon.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
yooperfan
12 years ago

Cushing will be out.. the middle of that defense just became easier to run upon.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



So, I wonder if McCarthy will play to that advantage or play stubborn.

porky88
12 years ago

5. Take advantage of their special teams.

The Texans are in the bottom third of the league in punt return coverage and kick return coverage. We need to take advantage of those weaknesses and give us an assist in field position.


Texans, to me, is going to be a similar game to the Niners. And we should of and could have won that game.

We can win this game.. this is not a team that cannot be beaten. We should have a chance to win this game late or hold the lead late. Time to rectify some demons. We just need to play up to our potential and eliminate mistakes as often as possible.

------

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 


I thought the 49ers dominated Green Bay. There wasn't any point during the game where I felt the Packers were in control.

Regardless, I fully expect Green Bay to keep this week within a touchdown because that's just how the Packers roll. With the exception of the playoff game versus the Giants, I can't remember receiving a beat down during the Mike McCarthy/Aaron Rodgers era.

However, I don't think they can win without Randall Cobb having a career showing. He needs to affect this game via special teams, running the ball, and in the receiving game. It may take a big return to give the Packers a chance of winning. Because without the return game, I don't know how Green Bay's offense gets going versus a Texan defense that is good enough to limit Aaron Rodgers.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago
I simply have no clue.

If they play the way they did most of the first half of the Dolt game, they'll win by 7-10.
If they play/call the game the way they did in the second half, they'll be lucky to be within 30.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
lolleren
12 years ago
Packers 14
Texans 38

Rodgers need to show he is still the same QB as last year, otherwise the score could be even more lopsided.
blank
vikesrule
12 years ago
Matt Schaub currently has a higher QB rating than Rodgers and runs a competent offense that includes a great run game and a pretty effective passing game.
Arian Foster is running great, and TE Owen Daniels and WR Andre Johnson have been performing pretty well.

And unlike the Packers, the Texans offense is not one dimensional.

With Benson out, the Packers are back where they started at the running back position—searching for a dependable ball carrier.
Aaron Rodgers has been sacked 21 times this year, including five in the second half against the Colts last week.

Without facing the threat of a strong running game, and with J.J. Watt leading the NFL in sacks, the Texans will be blitzing and putting pressure on Aaron Rodgers early and often.
Rodgers will be spending more time horizontal than vertical this coming week.

After Week 6, the Packers will be 2-4.



Texans 34 - Packers 17
nerdmann
12 years ago

Matt Schaub currently has a higher QB rating than Rodgers and runs a competent offense that includes a great run game and a pretty effective passing game.
Arian Foster is running great, and TE Owen Daniels and WR Andre Johnson have been performing pretty well.

And unlike the Packers, the Texans offense is not one dimensional.

With Benson out, the Packers are back where they started at the running back position—searching for a dependable ball carrier.
Aaron Rodgers has been sacked 21 times this year, including five in the second half against the Colts last week.

Without facing the threat of a strong running game, and with J.J. Watt leading the NFL in sacks, the Texans will be blitzing and putting pressure on Aaron Rodgers early and often.
Rodgers will be spending more time horizontal than vertical this coming week.

After Week 6, the Packers will be 2-4.



Texans 34 - Packers 17

Originally Posted by: vikesrule 



We'll play up to our competition.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
lolleren
12 years ago

Matt Schaub currently has a higher QB rating than Rodgers and runs a competent offense that includes a great run game and a pretty effective passing game.
Arian Foster is running great, and TE Owen Daniels and WR Andre Johnson have been performing pretty well.

And unlike the Packers, the Texans offense is not one dimensional.

With Benson out, the Packers are back where they started at the running back position—searching for a dependable ball carrier.
Aaron Rodgers has been sacked 21 times this year, including five in the second half against the Colts last week.

Without facing the threat of a strong running game, and with J.J. Watt leading the NFL in sacks, the Texans will be blitzing and putting pressure on Aaron Rodgers early and often.
Rodgers will be spending more time horizontal than vertical this coming week.

After Week 6, the Packers will be 2-4.



Texans 34 - Packers 17

Originally Posted by: vikesrule 



The Texans will not need to blitz to put Rodgers on his back.

blank
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (6m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (18m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (28m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (48m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (57m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (5h) : Packers will get in
    beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.