Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

NEW YORK -- National League MVP Ryan Braun's 50-game suspension was overturned Thursday by baseball arbitrator Shyam Das, and a source told ESPN that Major League Baseball officials are livid over the decision.

Braun's case marks the first time a baseball player has successfully challenged a drug-related penalty in a grievance.

The decision was announced Thursday by the Major League Baseball Players Association, one day before the 28-year-old outfielder was due to report to spring training with the Milwaukee Brewers.

Fantasy Spin: Braun Back In First Round

Milwaukee Brewers OF Ryan Braun has successfully appealed his suspension for a positive drug test. And barring further developments he is once again worthy of a first-round selection, writes ESPN.com's Tristan H. Cockcroft. Story

Braun tested positive in October for elevated testosterone, and ESPN revealed the positive test in December.

"I am very pleased and relieved by today's decision," Braun said in a statement. "It is the first step in restoring my good name and reputation. We were able to get through this because I am innocent and the truth is on our side.

"We provided complete cooperation throughout, despite the highly unusual circumstances. I have been an open book, willing to share details from every aspect of my life as part of this investigation, because I have nothing to hide. I have passed over 25 drug tests in my career, including at least three in the past year."

Braun didn't argue evidence of tampering and didn't dispute the science, but argued protocol had not been followed. A second source confirmed to ESPN investigative reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and T.J. Quinn that Braun questioned the chain of custody and collection procedure.

According to one of the sources, the collector, after getting Braun's sample, was supposed to take the sample to a FedEx Office for shipping.

But the source said the collector thought the FedEx Office was closed because it was late on a Saturday and felt the sample wouldn't get shipped until Monday.

As has occurred in some other instances, the collector took the sample home and kept it in a cool place, in his basement at his residence in Wisconsin, according to the source.

Policy states that the sample is supposed to get to FedEx as soon as possible.

Braun's initial T/E ratio was more than 20:1. Sources previously confirmed synthetic testosterone in his system. A source says MLB is livid and is considering options and other comment.

Hill and Schlereth

ESPN Investigative Reporter Mark Fainaru-Wada explains how and why Ryan Braun's suspension appeal was upheld by Major League Baseball.

The source told ESPN the seals were totally intact and testing never reflected any degradation of the sample. Based on the World Anti-Doping Agency code, this is exactly what would have been expected to happen, and the collector took the proper action, the source said.

The source also noted that synthetic testosterone doesn't just show up because a sample sits in one place or another.

Travis Tygart, chief executive officer of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, called the decision "a real gut-kick to clean athletes."

"To have this sort of technicality of all technicalities let a player off ... it's just a sad day for all the clean players and those that abide by the rules within professional baseball," he said.

The players association did not supply reasoning behind Thursday's decision.

A person familiar with the situation told The Associated Press that, after being informed of the positive result, Braun asked to have another urine test taken, and that the second test was within normal range.

An evidentiary hearing on Braun's appeal was held Jan. 19-20 in New York, ending the day before the player accepted the NL MVP award at a black-tie dinner.

"Today the arbitration panel announced its decision, by a 2-1 vote, to sustain Ryan Braun's grievance challenging his 50-game suspension by the commissioner's office," a statement from the players' association said.

MLB executive vice president Rob Manfred and union head Michael Weiner are part of the arbitration panel, and management and the union almost always split their votes, leaving Das, the independent panel member, to make the decision.

Manfred said management disagreed with the decision by Das. It is the first time a drug suspension has been overturned in a grievance, baseball officials said.

"It has always been Major League Baseball's position that no matter who tests positive, we will exhaust all avenues in pursuit of the appropriate discipline. We have been true to that position in every instance, because baseball fans deserve nothing less," Manfred said. "As a part of our drug testing program, the commissioner's office and the players' association agreed to a neutral third party review for instances that are under dispute. While we have always respected that process, Major League Baseball vehemently disagrees with the decision rendered today by arbitrator Shyam Das."

Attempts by ESPN to reach Das have been unsuccessful.

Braun hit .312 with 33 homers and 111 RBIs last year and led Milwaukee to the NL Championship Series, where the Brewers lost to the eventual World Series champion St. Louis Cardinals. The Brewers are counting on his offense following the departure of Prince Fielder, who became a free agent and signed with the Detroit Tigers.

Braun already was signed through 2015 when the Brewers gave him a new deal running through 2020 that added $105 million and guaranteed him a total of $145.5 million over a decade.

"MLB and cable sports tried to sully the reputation of an innocent man," Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers said on Twitter. "Picked the wrong guy to mess with. Truth will set u free #exonerated."

Brewers closer John Axford added on Twitter: "All I can say is that Braun has exemplary character is continuing to handle this in an unbelievable manner."

Positive tests for performance-enhancing drugs have been relatively rare under the major league testing program, with just two others in 2011: Tampa Bay outfielder Manny Ramirez and Colorado Rockies catcher Eliezer Alfonzo. Ramirez at first retired rather than face a 100-game suspension for a second positive test. Wanting to return this year, he is serving a 50-game penalty -- the length was shortened because he missed most of last year.

ESPN  wrote:


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

MLB and cable sports tried to sully the reputation of an innocent man. Picked the wrong guy to mess with. Truth will set u free #exonerated. When its guilty until proven innocent, all u need are the facts. #howsthecrowmlb #exonerated.

I’ll let my buddy take it from here. All u idiots talking about technicality open up for some crow too. See if Espn gets pressured not to . . . let the people hear the truth. Should get interesting. #exonerated#shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Aaron Rodgers (Twitter) wrote:



Here's an article on PFT .

UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
It might be Aaron Rodgers who wants to shut his mouth here. In this case, overturning of the suspension does not exactly equate to exoneration. Braun himself never disputed the validity of the tests themselves, just the chain of custody of the samples. He left it to the public to draw their own conclusions -- that perhaps the samples were tampered with after protocol was not followed -- but there was no evidence of such tampering. The seals were fully intact. In choosing the tack he took, Braun all but tacitly admitted the results were valid. I'm not saying I don't think he should have gotten off on this technicality -- I think preservation of the chain of custody is of paramount importance, and this defeat will probably spur MLB to tighten up procedures -- but to say that Braun's innocence was vindicated here would be a huge stretch. His second, normal urine test is no evidence of his innocence, since from what I have read, it has been shown that second tests taken the same day as a positive result can show normal hormone levels.

I am actually disappointed this was how he got off the hook. I had hoped information substantiating his innocence would emerge. Now for the rest of his career, a cloud of suspicion that he probably got away with a fast one will be hanging over his head.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

It might be Aaron Rodgers who wants to shut his mouth here. In this case, overturning of the suspension does not exactly equate to exoneration. Braun himself never disputed the validity of the tests themselves, just the chain of custody of the samples. He left it to the public to draw their own conclusions -- that perhaps the samples were tampered with after protocol was not followed -- but there was no evidence of such tampering. The seals were fully intact. In choosing the tack he took, Braun all but tacitly admitted the results were valid. I'm not saying I don't think he should have gotten off on this technicality -- I think preservation of the chain of custody is of paramount importance, and this defeat will probably spur MLB to tighten up procedures -- but to say that Braun's innocence was vindicated here would be a huge stretch. His second, normal urine test is no evidence of his innocence, since from what I have read, it has been shown that second tests taken the same day as a positive result can show normal hormone levels.

I am actually disappointed this was how he got off the hook. I had hoped information substantiating his innocence would emerge. Now for the rest of his career, a cloud of suspicion that he probably got away with a fast one will be hanging over his head.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Agreed and what I posted on the other Braun thread. Many people (both innocent and guilty) have won on technicalities. It doesn't prove anything other than we have procedures and they must be followed.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
Nothing wrong with the guy speaking out for his friend who was going through something pretty shitty. You guys have no loyalty at all to your friends huh? Just cower behind the shades when your buddy is getting beat around? Wimps! 🙂
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Nothing wrong with the guy speaking out for his friend who was going through something pretty shitty. You guys have no loyalty at all to your friends huh? Just cower behind the shades when your buddy is getting beat around? Wimps! :)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Are you still harping on that? Boy talk about beating a 🐴

[neener]
UserPostedImage
nathaniel
13 years ago
Braun never challenged the validity of the tests, which he could have done. He offered to take a DNA test to prove they weren't his samples, MLB said "OK", then Braun backed out. He was let off on a technicality that had NOTHING to do with the test results. All the seals on the actual sample, the bag and the box were all completely sealed and not tampered with. The A and B samples ended up with the exact same results.

When Braun decides to challenge the actual test results instead of the method of transportation, then I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. The fact that anyone sees this as an acquittal and complete explanation of the test results is just a tad delusional. Again, the appeal has NOTHING to do with the test results, and Braun hasn't challenged the results. That really can't be stated enough. If someone accused me of something I didn't do, and my only legal action was to discredit that person instead of proving my innocence, I'd sure as hell expect people to be skeptical of me. His next move will be going after ESPN for leaking his name, and he has every right to do that. It should have been confidential and anonymous. But remember, his first legal action wasn't to prove his innocence, but to discredit the collector. There's a big difference.

Now, how do you all feel about Roger Clemens? There is literally more testable evidence against Ryan Braun than there is against Roger Clemens, but I'm sure I can speak for everyone when I say Roger Clemens is a cheater. Even I believe that. Innocent until proven guilty, though, right? So how is that fair? Is it because Ryan Braun plays for the Brewers? Because he's Aaron Rodgers' friend? Anyone else gets off on this technicality and I highly doubt anyone gives them the benefit of the doubt. Including me.
blank
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
I feel after the first sentence I lost interest because it started off inaccurate. So many love to knock others down to make themselves feel above them. Pathetic society we live in these days.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Uh, what? His first sentence is entirely accurate. Braun challenged the chain of custody, not the test results themselves. He never once disputed the scientific validity of the results. Your ad hominem is unwarranted.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Uh, what? His first sentence is entirely accurate. Braun challenged the chain of custody, not the test results themselves. He never once disputed the scientific validity of the results. Your ad hominem is unwarranted.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



lmao o.k. won't be going through this again here as I did with CNN punks and ESPN nimrods.


Believe whichever flavor of bullshit tastes best! Nuts anyone?


UserPostedImage
Porforis
  • Porforis
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Uh, what? His first sentence is entirely accurate. Braun challenged the chain of custody, not the test results themselves. He never once disputed the scientific validity of the results. Your ad hominem is unwarranted.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



When you're fighting something in court or in a situation like this - innocent or otherwise, are you going to try to disprove everything you were accused of, or take the best shot you can to get off the hook? If you were accused of a severe crime, would you rather be in prison for 15 years or live your life a free man where most people are convinced you're guilty and got off on a technicality? Braun gains little with the DNA test if he and his (legal) team is confident that going a different route is a better chance to get him off the hook.
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
What's your point? The point is that nathaniel made a factually accurate statement, and Kevin jumped on him and impugned his integrity. I never said I agreed or disagreed with nathaniel's overall thesis, because I think that's beside the point. Regardless of what Braun's motives were for the strategy he adopted, I don't think Kevin's attack was was called for.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
  • Porforis
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

What's your point? The point is that nathaniel made a factually accurate statement, and Kevin jumped on him and impugned his integrity. I never said I agreed or disagreed with nathaniel's overall thesis, because I think that's beside the point. Regardless of what Braun's motives were for the strategy he adopted, I don't think Kevin's attack was was called for.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Well that's pretty boring.
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Braun never challenged the validity of the tests, which he could have done. He offered to take a DNA test to prove they weren't his samples, MLB said "OK", then Braun backed out.

Originally Posted by: nathaniel 



Ryan Braun won his appeal  of his positive drug test on Thursday, and yesterday the Brewers outfielder and reigning National League MVP flatly denied ever using performance-enhancing drugs.



What's your point? The point is that nathaniel made a factually accurate statement, and Kevin jumped on him and impugned his integrity. I never said I agreed or disagreed with nathaniel's overall thesis, because I think that's beside the point. Regardless of what Braun's motives were for the strategy he adopted, I don't think Kevin's attack was was called for.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I'm going to have to read up on the meaning of "factually accurate". Try to keep in mind that Ryan Braun's results were NEVER supposed to be made public UNTIL the conclusion of the appeal. Thus, he was not PERMITTED to speak directly about certain aspects of the results, such as validity. Did you not read his "lawyer speak" statement when it was first WRONGFULLY made public?

ESPN put Ryan Braun in a shitty position. They made public the results prior to his appeal being concluded and because HE obeyed the rules, he's gonna be blasted for it? Pretty ignorant and uncalled for if you ask me for my opinion.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
13 years ago
Couple of random thoughts without barbs, but I shall preface it with this, I would not wager a penny either way if he did or did not have something in his sample. We don't have all the facts that were presented to the panel.


1) Braun was robbed of confidentiality.. unfairly.

2) We don't know the timing of the DNA test offer and whom really didn't want to follow through with it.

3) Braun's team went through the process step by step and attacked every link.

4) How is he really suppose to challenge the test itself if something improper happened with the sample?

5) Explain why MLB isn't talking about the "B" sample and what it showed? Or why Braun isn't talking about it for that matter.

6) 25 clean tests to one with some handling problems.. I think the panel made the right call in overturning this one. Plain an simple, written protocol to operating protocol varied.

7) I think sports as a whole have a ways to go in the testing process to truly weed out PED's and provide some protections to players in general to ensure privacy and due process before there careers are brought into question.

8) I do believe this story is not closed yet.. and honestly as a Brewer fan, I don't know that is a good thing.

I want to believe that Braun is completely innocent, but we have heard those adamant words of denial before. Personally, I choose to believe his innocence until proven guilty. Not in reverse.



"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
MLB fires arbitrator from Braun case
 


Major League Baseball management has fired Shyam Das, the arbitrator who overturned Ryan Braun's drug suspension in February.

MLB informed Das and the players' association of its decision last week. Das had been baseball's permanent arbitrator since 1999, part of what technically is a three-man panel that also includes a representative of management and labor.

''Shyam is the longest-tenured panel chair in our bargaining relationship,'' union head Michael Weiner said. ''For 13 years, from the beginning to the end of his tenure, he served the parties with professionalism and distinction.''

Baseball's collective bargaining agreement says the arbitrator can be removed by the players' association or management at any time with written notice.



The sides will now try to select a successor. If they cannot agree, baseball's collective bargaining agreement calls for them to ask the American Arbitration Association for a list of ''prominent, professional arbitrators.'' The sides would then alternate striking names from the list until one remains.


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
This means Ryan Braun was guilty and should be banned from Baseball like Shoeless Joe. I'm saddened and disappointed. I'm going to burn my Ryan Braun jersey this weekend using tears of disappointment as lighter fluid.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago
Didn't say anything back then, but there are reasons for "chain of custody" and other courtroom rules of evidence.

They usually aren't just technicalities. They are there because the details can really matter; and in a trial courtroom, as opposed to the "court of public opinion," the evidence doesn't just get let in based on who might be able to finagle access to a mike or a blog.

I have no idea whether Braun did or didn't. But I do think anyone bases their weighing of evidence of this sort by trying to perceive the truth of the matter via public babblings of talking heads and sports personalities not constrained by state/federal rules of evidence ... well, I think you're a pinhead. Or to quote the eloquence of DakotaT...you're a dumbass.




And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
So if the Fed Ex offices are closed after 5 pm on a Saturday why didn't MLB and the PA have it in writing that they did not want any samples taken after noon on Saturday until 9 am on Monday? If they were a little clearer in their instructions there would not be a second one of these improperly handled cases this year.

Which brings up another issue, different substances have longer/shorter shelf life in the body. I wonder if some players have learned if they take a substance on Friday afternoon that the residue will be gone by Monday morning?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (5h) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
Zero2Cool (11h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
Zero2Cool (11h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
Zero2Cool (11h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.