You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages<123>
Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline zombieslayer  
#16 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:20:24 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Well, good news. I'm glad Aaron doesn't need surgery.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline RaiderPride  
#17 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:56:36 PM(UTC)
RaiderPride

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,000
Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 91
Applause Received: 182

Cool Zeee.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Offline shield4life  
#18 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:19:31 PM(UTC)
shield4life

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,242
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Montreal

Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 24

We're so lucky that we've got Aaron Rodgers. We should be grateful that we got a QB that can play and that has been groomed well. We could of easily been in those situations where the team itself is good but the QB just plain terrible. It's very hard to find that franchise QB that's actually good at his spot.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
Offline bozz_2006  
#19 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:42:07 PM(UTC)
bozz_2006

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,949
Joined: 7/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 11

ted got sooooooo lucky with that pick!
UserPostedImage
Offline zombieslayer  
#20 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:14:57 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
ted got sooooooo lucky with that pick!


And just think...

The Niners could have had Aaron Rodgers. Instead, they got Alex Smith.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline go.pack.go.  
#21 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:19:26 PM(UTC)
go.pack.go.

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,743
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 44

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
We're so lucky that we've got Aaron Rodgers. We should be grateful that we got a QB that can play and that has been groomed well. We could of easily been in those situations where the team itself is good but the QB just plain terrible. It's very hard to find that franchise QB that's actually good at his spot.


WTF are you talking about? Aaron Rodgers sucks, he can't even throw a ball like 20 yards....what are you smokin'?
Signature made by me
UserPostedImage
SUPERBOWL XLV CHAMPS!!!!
Offline Nonstopdrivel  
#22 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 12:42:17 AM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,691
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Germany

Applause Given: 365
Applause Received: 263

Aaron Rodgers is nothing more than a system quarterback, dontchaknow.
UserPostedImage
Offline Zero2Cool  
#23 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 2:06:49 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

United States
Posts: 25,224
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,738
Applause Received: 1,786

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Aaron Rodgers is nothing more than a system quarterback, dontchaknow.
What's wrong with a system QB? Assuming the system doesn't suck.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline Nonstopdrivel  
#24 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 3:08:50 AM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,691
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Germany

Applause Given: 365
Applause Received: 263

Great question. Maybe one of our resident Rodgers skeptics can provide an answer.
UserPostedImage
Offline zombieslayer  
#25 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 3:55:47 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Great question. Maybe one of our resident Rodgers skeptics can provide an answer.


You know what's funny is I really wanted Favre to start as our QB in '08. I think by around midseason, it became clear that even though Favre was having a spectacular year (at the time), Aaron has become just as good and the QB position was NOT the problem.

I was sold on Aaron and became a huge fan of his while still rooting for Favre to do well with the Jets.

I'm really wondering if people who study football still see Aaron as the problem with the Packers. The big problem is obviously our DL. Our OL is the second problem. Mike McCarthy also won't go for the throat and that's another problem. I really think if we had the Mike McCarthy of '07 instead of the kinder, gentler Mike McCarthy of '08, Aaron would have thrown 30+ TDs in '08.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline dhazer  
#26 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 4:04:06 PM(UTC)
dhazer

Rank: Pro Bowl

Posts: 3,872
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 43
Applause Received: 170

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Aaron Rodgers is nothing more than a system quarterback, dontchaknow.
What's wrong with a system QB? Assuming the system doesn't suck.


Well the Rodgers skeptics shouldn't be answering this, it should be all the people praising him. You people are the same ones that claim that Rodgers is better than Collins, Flacco, and Ryan because they are system qbs. They do what is asked of them and and win games, but yet it wasn't them it was either the defense that won the game or it was the running game. I could care less what kind of a qb they are they lead there teams to Wins and thats all that counts. You can have a qb throw for 6,000 yards 50 tds with a 4-12 record and a qb that throws for 2600 yards and 13 tds but the team finishes 12-4, I would be more than happy with the latter qb because he does whats asked of him and he wins.

Btw this wasn't meant to cut down Rodgers (but i'm sure a few of you will read it that way) just meant to say i would want a qb that does what it takes to win games.
UserPostedImage

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be :)
Offline MassPackersFan  
#27 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 4:34:09 PM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,921
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 4

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Aaron Rodgers is nothing more than a system quarterback, dontchaknow.
What's wrong with a system QB? Assuming the system doesn't suck.


Well the Rodgers skeptics shouldn't be answering this, it should be all the people praising him. You people are the same ones that claim that Rodgers is better than Collins, Flacco, and Ryan because they are system qbs. They do what is asked of them and and win games, but yet it wasn't them it was either the defense that won the game or it was the running game. I could care less what kind of a qb they are they lead there teams to Wins and thats all that counts. You can have a qb throw for 6,000 yards 50 tds with a 4-12 record and a qb that throws for 2600 yards and 13 tds but the team finishes 12-4, I would be more than happy with the latter qb because he does whats asked of him and he wins.

Btw this wasn't meant to cut down Rodgers (but i'm sure a few of you will read it that way) just meant to say i would want a qb that does what it takes to win games.


I guarantee you wouldn't be more than happy with the latter qb if he was stuck on the former team.
UserPostedImage
Offline bozz_2006  
#28 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 4:48:53 PM(UTC)
bozz_2006

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,949
Joined: 7/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 11

i'd be wishing his stats were better, thinking if they were that maybe we'd be 13-3 or 14-2...

there's nothing wrong with a system quarterback. my definition of a system QB is one who fits well in the offensive scheme. In my opinion, if you are an effective offensive coordinator, you will work to make sure you have a system QB.
UserPostedImage
Offline Nonstopdrivel  
#29 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 5:08:16 PM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,691
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Germany

Applause Given: 365
Applause Received: 263

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
You people are the same ones that claim that Rodgers is better than Collins, Flacco, and Ryan because they are system qbs.


I can't speak for the others, but speaking for myself, I can say that is a gross mischaracterization of my argument. I claim Rodgers is better than Collins, Flacco, and Ryan because his output was objectively better. But for those of you who say "the only statistic that matters is wins and losses" and "stats don't matter," that argument falls on deaf ears, so the discussion goes nowhere.
UserPostedImage
Offline MassPackersFan  
#30 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2009 5:11:23 PM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,921
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 4

If victories define the quality of a QB and the Superbowl is the greatest of all victories, then Trent Dilfer was the best quarterback in the NFL one year.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.614 seconds.