You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Saturday, June 15, 2013 8:48:25 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,230
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 70

LombardiAve wrote:
What were the Green Bay Packers thinking by issuing the number 5 to wide receiver Terrell Sinkfield? Don't they know what happened the last time they did that? Remember the flak that Don Majkowski — and the Packers — received when they issued the number to him back in 1987? It was significant and strong [...]
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline beast  
#2 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 10:39:57 AM(UTC)
beast

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,518
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 119
Applause Received: 211


Which roster numbers going to 90 in the offseason retired numbers are starting to become a small problem.

I figure one of these days the NFL is ether going to say numbers can't be retired any more and all numbers are in play.

Or the more likely that numbers can be twice as long as one guy is on offense and the other is on defense (like I've seen in training camps in the past) and people see in college football.
America's team... of the people, by the people, for the people
UserPostedImage
~ made by pack93z
Offline Zero2Cool  
#3 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 11:06:12 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

United States
Posts: 25,223
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,740
Applause Received: 1,790

There shouldn't be ANY retired numbers. To honor the player, take it out of circulation for a decade and then re-enter it. It serves more honor in the number being used than not. You see that number, it conjures memories ... think about it.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Online texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 11:20:25 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,375
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 349
Applause Received: 210

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
There shouldn't be ANY retired numbers. To honor the player, take it out of circulation for a decade and then re-enter it. It serves more honor in the number being used than not. You see that number, it conjures memories ... think about it.


I tend to agree, this would be a good compromise. The problem, particularly with the Packers, is there are just SO MANY numbers that could and arguably should be retired - based on what they did for the team in their time. Until this or some other acceptable policy is adopted, they could go with something like the colleges do - duplicate numbers in camp and preseason, one O and one D.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline beast  
#5 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 11:33:54 AM(UTC)
beast

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,518
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 119
Applause Received: 211

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
There shouldn't be ANY retired numbers. To honor the player, take it out of circulation for a decade and then re-enter it.


Great idea.
America's team... of the people, by the people, for the people
UserPostedImage
~ made by pack93z
Offline mi_keys  
#6 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 3:42:35 PM(UTC)
mi_keys

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,309
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 140
Applause Received: 215

In Europe with soccer you don't really see retired numbers but certain numbers for certain teams hold special significance. Usually, those numbers are reserved for players who have established themselves and earned the right to carry on the tradition associated with that number. Granted, for the longest time, numbers were assigned to positions, not individual players (probably explains why it has evolved differently today where you don't see retired numbers).

Still, I think something like that could work. Where a player could establish themselves after few years and then, if they wanted, they could switch to that reserved number. For instance, I look at the number 36 and remember elite safety play, having grown up watching Leroy Butler and later Nick Collins hold that number for much of my lifetime. You could take that number and only give it to safeties (or maybe more broadly defensive backs) that have established themselves as great players. That way, you honor the player(s) that have established a great history with that number, but it is still available for use going forward.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Offline CaliforniaCheez  
#7 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 4:38:13 PM(UTC)
CaliforniaCheez

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 927
Joined: 9/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 5
Applause Received: 126

The issuance of the number is only temporary.

If he makes the team it will change

If he doesn't make the team the controversy is ended.

A WR cannot wear 21 or 36.

While 5 is controversial, wearing 80 might currently be more controversial.

For the first time in years there are no duplicate numbers on the large offseason roster.
blank
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 6/16/2013(UTC)
Offline yooperfan  
#8 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 5:09:51 PM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,713
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 476
Applause Received: 225

Doesn't matter Packers fans will remember the "Golden Boy" till the end of time.
Nobody will remember Sinkfield after August.
Offline nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 8:25:41 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,515
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,106
Applause Received: 470

Originally Posted by: yooperfan Go to Quoted Post
Doesn't matter Packers fans will remember the "Golden Boy" till the end of time.
Nobody will remember Sinkfield after August.


Kid has a chance. He's got Sam Shields measurables and iirc Edgar Bennett coaching him up.

There's gonna be competition there though, that's for sure.

It's just a camp number. Soon as players start getting cut, they'll change it.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.450 seconds.