You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

4 Pages«<234
Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline longtimefan  
#46 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:54:32 PM(UTC)
longtimefan

Rank: Pro Bowl

Posts: 3,499
Joined: 11/30/2006(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 21

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
well this has turned into a diss me, love grant thread haha


Well my gawd man...

He really did not have a bad game at all..He had a good game..

It IS not his fault that Mike McCarthy decided not to use him effectively at the end
Offline packersfan101101  
#47 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:59:42 PM(UTC)
packersfan101101

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 109
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
well this has turned into a diss me, love grant thread haha


Well my gawd man...

He really did not have a bad game at all..He had a good game..

It IS not his fault that Mike McCarthy decided not to use him effectively at the end


i disagree with the "good game " part, but yea ur right about the mike McCarthy thing. that is true i didnt think of that.

i think that Mike McCarthy is a good coach, but alot of the time i dont agree with his play calling
brandon jackson is amazing
Offline longtimefan  
#48 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 12:04:33 AM(UTC)
longtimefan

Rank: Pro Bowl

Posts: 3,499
Joined: 11/30/2006(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 21

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
well this has turned into a diss me, love grant thread haha


Well my gawd man...

He really did not have a bad game at all..He had a good game..

It IS not his fault that Mike McCarthy decided not to use him effectively at the end


i disagree with the "good game " part, but yea ur right about the mike McCarthy thing. that is true i didnt think of that.

i think that Mike McCarthy is a good coach, but alot of the time i dont agree with his play calling


if your mad about him making big money and not performing, then make a thread about Rodgers he performed worse IMO
Offline packersfan101101  
#49 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 12:11:15 AM(UTC)
packersfan101101

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 109
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)


i think aaron rodger performed fine, except for that 1 deep pass that resulted in an interception, that was a bad decision
brandon jackson is amazing
Offline TengoJuego  
#50 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 12:26:24 AM(UTC)
TengoJuego

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 953
Joined: 8/16/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 1

Aaron still continues to hold the ball longer than he should. I wish he would run more too.
Offline TimeToThink  
#51 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 4:07:10 AM(UTC)
TimeToThink

Rank: Practice Squad

Posts: 15
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)


Personally, I thought Grant played well today.

In fact, while watching the game, on more than one occasion, I said, "Man, Grant is playing much better"

Over 4 yards a carry is pretty decent against nearly any run defense. Against the Titans, it's very good.

Grant was not the reason for our loss. Sure, you could make the argument that if he had a spectacular game, we would have won. But you could make that argument about every player on the field.

If Rodgers played better, we would have won. If Woodson picked off a pass and returned it for a TD, we would have won. If Jennings only broke a few tackles and ran for a TD, we would have won. Etc. Etc.
blank
Offline warhawk  
#52 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 2:25:33 PM(UTC)
warhawk

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,403
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 161

Not one comment here about the fact Clifton was a late scratch and that meant two moves at the last minute for the O line?

Geez, this is a tough crowd. It's one thing when a guy is injured and you have the week to work the starters, especially when your playing one of the top defensive units in the game.

For what it was worth, and I know they rotate and work these guys in during the week, but as far as the O line goes the two weeks off and the extra prep time went out the window when Clifton couldn't start.

We threw a rookie in there and Colledge did a decent job but he's not Clifton and anyone thinking this didn't have some affect is kidding themselves. Especially when you consider the amount of stunts those guys run.

I thought we got as much out of them and the running game as we could expect. Do you know how many +10 yard gains the Titans have allowed all year going into this game? TWELVE.

Grant had three. I think expectations around here run a little beyond high.
"The train is leaving the station."
Offline Since69  
#53 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 2:57:01 PM(UTC)
Since69

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,133
Joined: 11/2/2006(UTC)

Applause Given: 82
Applause Received: 81

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
He ran well today but he couldn't catch a cold in antartica


I agree. I was stunned when to find that he's only caught four passes all year...
UserPostedImage
Offline gbpfan  
#54 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 8:14:35 PM(UTC)
gbpfan

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 563
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Location: milwaukee

Applause Received: 3

i liked what grant did in the game you could tell he was a little frustrated when he was tackled at the 50 but i thought jackson was good too i think we were one of the better teams that the titans faced and when the front can give a-rod more time and he had some of that yesterday think they did okay
blank
Offline TOPackerFan  
#55 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 8:32:55 PM(UTC)
TOPackerFan

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 148
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post


We threw a rookie in there and Colledge did a decent job but he's not Clifton


You're right, he's better (at least in the run game).
Show me a good loser, I'll show you a loser - Vince
Offline thetombradyhater  
#56 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 11:34:07 PM(UTC)
thetombradyhater

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 22
Joined: 10/17/2006(UTC)


Considering my lowered expectations after the beginning of this season and the fact that we were playing arguably the best defense in the league, I was actually pretty satisfied with Grant's performance.
Go Pack Go!
UserPostedImage
Offline TheEngineer  
#57 Posted : Tuesday, November 4, 2008 12:50:11 AM(UTC)
TheEngineer

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,621
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)


It looks like Grant's slowly but surely getting back into his groove. We'll see next week against another good run defense team in Minnesota how well he can play.
blank
Offline packersfan101101  
#58 Posted : Tuesday, November 4, 2008 1:08:35 AM(UTC)
packersfan101101

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 109
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post


Grant had three. I think expectations around here run a little beyond high.


and they rightfully should be high, the packers are a talented well coached team
brandon jackson is amazing
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages«<234
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.893 seconds.