dhazer
11 years ago

How about we ban guns except for the 3 weeks we get to hunt. That's the only time I take mine out. Can't ban cars or trucks because they are used daily. Catch the drift there Haze?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



So all these people going on shooting sprees will wait for those 3 weeks? Do you not understand the only thing this gun ban is going to hurt is the law abiding citizen. Why is that so hard for you to understand. Look at the drug laws how good does that work? I can almost bet there are as many drug overdoses as there are gun killings a year. I just don't understand all this ban the guns thing. the drug dealers and gangsters and nuts are going to get guns one way or another but because of the laws you are telling us we can't defend ourselves.

The asshole running the country wants to be the dictator aka the next Hitler and this is another example.

look thru history at leaders that banned guns like Hitler, stalin, Mao, Kim, Castro and Qaddaffi, all wanted to run the world and now you can add Obama to the list. Think about this he bans assault rifles in the US but gives them to the drug Cartel in Mexico and must we forget he opened the borders to the illegals.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
11 years ago
If I believed in the death penalty, it would be for first degree murder ONLY. No exceptions.

I don't believe in it because there's not one government on the planet I'd trust enough to carry out a fair trial + an execution.

Conservatives claim they're for small government, yet believe a government can execute its citizens. That's yet another reason I'm proud to NOT call myself a conservative.

And for the record, my guns are not for killing animals. They're for killing people. People are a threat to me. Animals aren't. I'm not worried about a bunch of geese robbing my house to feed their meth habit. I'm not worried about some rabbits getting together and burning crosses on my lawn. I'm not worried about ducks blaming the recession on the wrong race/the wrong skin color/the wrong religion/the wrong sexual orientation/etc., and rounding up people and sending them to camps.

If you TRULY want to prevent genocide, keep guns in private hands. Anyone who says otherwise, I'd love to stick a history book up their ass.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DakotaT
11 years ago

So all these people going on shooting sprees will wait for those 3 weeks? Do you not understand the only thing this gun ban is going to hurt is the law abiding citizen. Why is that so hard for you to understand. Look at the drug laws how good does that work? I can almost bet there are as many drug overdoses as there are gun killings a year. I just don't understand all this ban the guns thing. the drug dealers and gangsters and nuts are going to get guns one way or another but because of the laws you are telling us we can't defend ourselves.

The asshole running the country wants to be the dictator aka the next Hitler and this is another example.

look thru history at leaders that banned guns like Hitler, stalin, Mao, Kim, Castro and Qaddaffi, all wanted to run the world and now you can add Obama to the list. Think about this he bans assault rifles in the US but gives them to the drug Cartel in Mexico and must we forget he opened the borders to the illegals.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Haze, you're a perfect example of fright wing programming. I feel bad for you my friend. Obama has 4 years left as president - if you think he can accomplish what you just wrote, I'm sorry, but you are just a fool.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
11 years ago

If I believed in the death penalty, it would be for first degree murder ONLY. No exceptions.

I don't believe in it because there's not one government on the planet I'd trust enough to carry out a fair trial + an execution.

Conservatives claim they're for small government, yet believe a government can execute its citizens. That's yet another reason I'm proud to NOT call myself a conservative.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



My guess is, that most people today, that consider or call themselves conservatives are strictly talking Fiscal Conservatism, Not social conservatism.

Personally, I have no problem with the death penalty, provided the person has gone through the appeal process. There should be no life in prison. Life should be death. And that appeal process should not take 15 years.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Oh, let me boil it down for you: Your communication 'ability' (more like lack thereof) blow. You need to work on it. Also, while you are at it, try some people skills, too.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Actually, you're the one who is lost. Did you even check into what I asked? Did you look into the most users date and find what happen on that date and correlate that to what I said about being FIRST on the internet with news REGARDLESS of accuracy? No sir, you did NOT! You just kept belittling my point because you lack the mental fortitude to grasp the psychological tactic that brainwashed you into thinking valid questions were posed from INACCURATE news sources/reports whom simply threw whatever online to get noticed FIRST!




I'm not convinced more Gun Control is the answer and I know having more guns is definitely not the answer. I mean, we have gun control already and it hasn't seemed to stop much. Then again, who's to say that with accuracy? Do we see many arrests spread country wide about an individual or members who have many assault weapons? Of course we don't because that's not what grabs peoples attention. Tragedy, now that's a different story. Tragedy gets most everyone's attention.
UserPostedImage
Formo
11 years ago

Actually, you're the one who is lost. Did you even check into what I asked? Did you look into the most users date and find what happen on that date and correlate that to what I said about being FIRST on the internet with news REGARDLESS of accuracy? No sir, you did NOT! You just kept belittling my point because you lack the mental fortitude to grasp the psychological tactic that brainwashed you into thinking valid questions were posed from INACCURATE news sources/reports whom simply threw whatever online to get noticed FIRST!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Oh, forgot how you knew all the details. Glad you answered the questions.

Wait, you didn't because you can't. Either because you lack the comprehension of basic communication and/or tact to express it. Either way, you are the one looking like a jackass. 'Answering' my questions with obtuse, confusing, and plain incoherent responses won't get you far, bucko.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Oh, forgot how you knew all the details. Glad you answered the questions.

Wait, you didn't because you can't. Either because you lack the comprehension of basic communication and/or tact to express it. Either way, you are the one looking like a jackass. 'Answering' my questions with obtuse, confusing, and plain incoherent responses won't get you far, bucko.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Continuing to put words in my mouth is only making you a jackass, buckwheat.

You want me to answer the questions he poses and I'm saying the questions arise from the multitude of inaccurate reports, because those reporting care not about accuracy but about being first on the 'breaking news'. Essentially, right back to my point of the author using the piss poor journalism in this country and leveraging brilliant wording to brainwash people thinking the many errant reports were FACTUAL reports, instead of being inaccurate shoot from the hip reports to get their article published first.

I really don't know how to make this more simple for you.

Shooting happens in school.
Reporters throw out anything they 'hear', claiming its from witnesses before verifying the information.
New reports come out after more information obtained.
Official report after confirmation of events while cross checking facts, etc...
Fella on the internet uses the multitude of flippant reports as facts that were retracted by Government and brainwashes weak minded folks who don't understand how to businesses try to monetize the internet.
Most people hate the Government, or at least dislike it strongly and don't trust it (no fault there) and that makes the aforementioned article more believable.


Does that make more sense? I ask because I care. I truly do not want people falling for this guy's manipulation. It really saddens me that people buy into that stuff. And I do not mean that in any negative connotation at all.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
11 years ago
Does anyone have any specific proposed solutions that we might debate?

zombieslayer
11 years ago

Does anyone have any specific proposed solutions that we might debate?

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Sure. You want to fix things?

Work less hours. Spend more time with your family. Stop drugging up your kids. Get to know your neighbors.

Do those 4 things and violent crime will plummet. Guaranteed.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
dfosterf
11 years ago

Sure. You want to fix things?

Work less hours. Spend more time with your family. Stop drugging up your kids. Get to know your neighbors.

Do those 4 things and violent crime will plummet. Guaranteed.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Will we get government compensation for that, or are you actually suggesting we do that for free?



Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Chase Young to sign $13M contract with Saints
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Yosh to Panthers what noooo. Wait he didn't do crap
    wpr (23h) : I say that he is technically HER BIL as he married her sister. I checked it out, he's considered my BIL as well. Sad.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : wpr, I assume its your BIL via marriage to your wife? If so, I can figure out where the smarts in the family went ;)
    wpr (18-Mar) : Mucky my B-I-L is Bare Stupid. I could write a book.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : As a teenager in Rockford IL I would get heckled by adults in public for wearing GB gear
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : if you think the online ones are bad, try *living amongst* them
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : Never doubt wprs loyalty. Poor guy is surrounded by Bears fans in Northern IL
    wpr (17-Mar) : pass Martha. Thanks for the invite though.
    Martha Careful (17-Mar) : blog * as the same ugly Illinois colors were adopted by the Baer
    Martha Careful (17-Mar) : WPR, perhaps you should be joining the Bears fans blog has the same ugly Illinois colors were adopted by the Bears
    Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : Ah a fellow U of Illinois hater. I can respect that though I imagine it's for different reasons
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : BTW. I didn't catch the game. I just hate Illinois.
    Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : They're your Big Ten Chumps and you will like it!
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : No, not for the record. Referee's handled that BS. Orange team was trash ass
    Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : *Your* Big Ten Chumps for the record
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : No, not Big Ten Champs. IL is big ten CHUMPS
    wpr (17-Mar) : Big Ten Champs
    wpr (17-Mar) : !!!
    wpr (17-Mar) : INI
    wpr (17-Mar) : ILL
    Martha Careful (17-Mar) : Wisconsin with an outstanding on in the men’s Big Ten basketball tournament. Let’s hope it continues in the NCAAs
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : Almost like taking QB in 2020 even if you don't need one is good move.
    Mucky Tundra (16-Mar) : 2021 QB Draft class looking like a real clunker
    Mucky Tundra (16-Mar) : A conditional 6th rounder? I remember Bears fans arguing they'd get a day 2 pick at worst lol
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : So I got the no extension part right and the have to wait on the CW physical wrong
    Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Bears are trading Justin Fields for a 2025 6th-round pick that goes to a 4th-round pick based on playtime, per sources.
    Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Former Packer Jarrett Bush opens Wisconsin’s first blow dry bar in Green Bay
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : If the Bears are not doing a deal with Washington, they also cannot trade Fields until Williams physical with them. All hail Caleb Williams!
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : The talent is undeniable, but the (advertised) haul is obscene.
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : If the Bears are cutting a deal with the Commanders, in either scenario, cannot happen until williams passes a Commanders physical
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : My guess is no to the Fields extension, but yes to the trade back with the Commanders.
    dhazer (15-Mar) : I think the Bears do a Love extension and they will trade out of the 1st pick and take the haul
    Martha Careful (15-Mar) : that might make sense
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Justin Fields to Steelers?
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Kenny Pickett. Eagles. Done.
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : They can claim best two WR tandem.
    Mucky Tundra (15-Mar) : Aaron Donald retiring
    dhazer (15-Mar) : Campbell signing with 49ers
    dhazer (15-Mar) : I love how the Bear Fans are now claiming they have the best skill players in the NFC North lol
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Vikings made a move to get a 2nd first round pick
    Mucky Tundra (15-Mar) : That's a not a bad deal for the Bears
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Bears have traded for WR Keenan Allen sending Chargers a fourth rounder.
    Martha Careful (15-Mar) : *signs
    Martha Careful (14-Mar) : MLB Devon White science with the Eagles
    Mucky Tundra (14-Mar) : But that was before FA started
    Mucky Tundra (14-Mar) : Dhaze, I thought Kurls would be their #1 target when I read that he was an Amos comp (jack of all trades guy)
    dhazer (14-Mar) : I would like to see the Packers target 2 more FA still available Kamren Curl Safety and Chase Young edge
    Martha Careful (14-Mar) : wow...didn't see that coming
    Zero2Cool (14-Mar) : AJ Dillon re-signing with Packers.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    55m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18-Mar / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    16-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    16-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    15-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

    15-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    14-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    14-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    14-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.