14 years ago
No No NO!!


It is the VP of officiating that says the legue made an error!!
I do not care about the opinion of someabody named Siefert.

When Pereira makes a proclamation it is the NFL's official position.

The official opinion of the NFL is the final word anddoes not belong in a thread calling the penalty legitimate by someone in no official capacity!!!!!

blank
dfosterf
14 years ago

No No NO!!


It is the VP of officiating that says the legue made an error!!
I do not care about the opinion of someabody named Siefert.

When Pereira makes a proclamation it is the NFL's official position.

The official opinion of the NFL is the final word anddoes not belong in a thread calling the penalty legitimate by someone in no official capacity!!!!!

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:




UserPostedImage

That should have never been called 13 posts
That Seifert is a homer 10 posts
Agrees with Seifert 0 posts
Seifert is not a homer 2 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter 10 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter with a link to the fact that the NFL ruled on the matter 3 posts

I don't care we won posts 6
Dhazer/dfost/and Buckeye bs posts several


C'mon dfosterf!!

Why are you for the penalty on Al Harris????




dfost- page 2 :


The VP of NFL in charge of officiating has said:

(As he essentially shrugged his shoulders)

The call was incorrect. (Pack that, you fool Seifert)

The ref was 20 yards downfield when he made the call (With a straight face he used this as justification)

The import of changing the rule to make it less severe of a penalty (discussed
many times in competition committee, he said) would encourage DB's to "take advantage" of the reduced impact of a violation.

____________________________________________________________

I am even more angry about this than I was originally. Seifert and his bullshit is infuriating enough, but when I reflect on how much of a "game changing" and ridiculously poor call this was---we are talking about not only a failure to make a correct call on the WR being off the line of scrimmage...we are also talking about a "free play" for the offense, in addition to the penalty itself.

Our DB's are targeted by the opposition as players designated to "watch"--- by the officials. It all goes to our bump and run history, coupled with Al and to a lesser degree Charles having established a reputation as "muggers" in this league...Rightly or wrongly. The refs have memories, and do listen when opponents and/or coaches point shit out. Then you bring in the moron factor established by Ahmad Carrol, and the crap just descends to a reputation of thuggery by our defensive backfield.

That call disgusts me greatly. Seifert disgusts me even more greatly for having the chutzpah to look at that, start digging in his rulebook, and proclaiming it as legitimate...if that isn't some sad homerism, I don't know what is.

This in the same game where asswipe almost took off Rodgers head in a no-call. Enjoy your vacation, Urlacher.

That crew sucks ass. I'd like to know which crew it was. The NFL can take their explanation letter and go wipe a baby's ass with it, btw.

"dfosterf" wrote:

TheKanataThrilla
14 years ago
I find the automatic first down for illegal contact to be a frustrating rule and second on my list of changes after the overtime rule. This should be a reviewable call. If they can review too many players on the field penalties they should be able to review whether you hit someone outside of 5 yards. The only problem would be all the non-calls that occur and perhaps challenges will happen when flags are not thrown.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
CaliforniaCheez, you seriously need a lesson in written irony and sarcasm. lol. Also, please enclose future quotes from other websites in

tags, which can be done by typing them or using that handy-dandy little button with the talk bubble on it.

As for the better title of CaliforniaCheez's thread, dfosterf, you actually could have merged the original thread into this one, keeping CaliforniaCheez's title while maintaining the chronological order of posts. I've been known to do that a time or two. 😉


UserPostedImage
dfosterf
14 years ago

CaliforniaCheez, you seriously need a lesson in written irony and sarcasm. lol. Also, please enclose future quotes from other websites in

tags, which can be done by typing them or using that handy-dandy little button with the talk bubble on it.

As for the better title of CaliforniaCheez's thread, dfosterf, you actually could have merged the original thread into this one, keeping CaliforniaCheez's title while maintaining the chronological order of posts. I've been known to do that a time or two. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



LOL

Thought about it, but then said to myself...

"Self, just you watch...change the title and the original poster is going to start complaining..."
flep
14 years ago
We still taliking about this.

The poster who said that the penalties would be offset and the down replayed has got the rules wrong.

Once Hester lined up off the line leaving the tackle uncovered he cannot go downfield on a passsing play. The formation is illegal.

Once he went downfield he had committed a penalty as inelegible downfield, therefore Al Harris cannot commit a penalty against hester for illegal contact as Hester should not have been in that position for Harris to make the contact.
Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years
UserPostedImage


I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!
Pack93z
14 years ago

CaliforniaCheez, you seriously need a lesson in written irony and sarcasm. lol. Also, please enclose future quotes from other websites in

tags, which can be done by typing them or using that handy-dandy little button with the talk bubble on it.

As for the better title of CaliforniaCheez's thread, dfosterf, you actually could have merged the original thread into this one, keeping CaliforniaCheez's title while maintaining the chronological order of posts. I've been known to do that a time or two. ;)

"dfosterf" wrote:

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



LOL

Thought about it, but then said to myself...

"Self, just you watch...change the title and the original poster is going to start complaining..."



I irony of the quote tags on this post is stuff legends are made of ( I am assuming on purpose).. I gotta go find some duct tape to reattach my ass.. :lol:

Sorry that is some funny poo right there.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
buckeyepackfan
14 years ago
"That should have never been called 13 posts
That Seifert is a homer 10 posts
Agrees with Seifert 0 posts
Seifert is not a homer 2 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter 10 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter with a link to the fact that the NFL ruled on the matter 3 posts

I don't care we won posts 6
Dhazer/dfost/and Buckeye bs posts several"
Use ignore button, it really works well!!!
:icon_smile: :icon_smile: :icon_smile: :icon_smile:
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Tezzy
14 years ago
Has anyone contacted Seifert to get a retraction? LOL.
Maybe, somehow, through Seifert's ignorance he was attempting to bring a spotlight to the issue of these types of calls. Wait, I'm giving him too much credit.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
14 years ago

Has anyone contacted Seifert to get a retraction? LOL.
Maybe, somehow, through Seifert's ignorance he was attempting to bring a spotlight to the issue of these types of calls. Wait, I'm giving him too much credit.

"Tezzy" wrote:



The whole point is that this thread is about something written by a guy named Seifert. Note the title of the thread that the penalty was fully legitimate.

Now the Vice President of the NFL has publicly admitted that the official made a mistake. The NFL's official position is that it was not legit.

Certainly the truth of the matter should be brought out and not buried on page 4 of the thread saying Al Harris deserved the penalty!

Shouldn't truth triumph over error?

Why should this board's official position be that Al Harris deserved the penalty and the official NFL position is not recognized?
blank
Fan Shout
dfosterf (8h) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (9h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (11h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (12h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (15h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (16h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
3h / Around The NFL / beast

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.