Garcia will bide his time, unless maybe KC wants to sign him(Cassell still hurt?), Garcia has proven he can step into a system and win ball games, if Aaron Rodgers would go down and JG is still available, then sign him.

The Packers system is not that much different from TB or Philly, he did fine in both places.

---

Not bad for discussion but he won't come to Green Bay because he wants a chance at a starting job thus the reason he went to Oakland.

---

I would love to have him on the team. If Aaron Rodgers went down, he could still lead us to a possible playoff run.

---

yeah me too.

---

Flynn won't want to stay a back up forever. He didn't come into the NFL to back up. We aren't grooming Flynn to take Rodgers spot. We are grooming him as trade bait for the future. Rogers is our future. there is no point keeping 2 young QB's on the staff that have futures as starters.(If Flynn does have a future as a starter.) Garcia can be a reliable back up for a few years.

I would prefer to keep Flynn as our #3 and continue to develop him. Then we trade him.

Future potential/trade bait are second priority to what your #2 can do for you now.

If Aaron Rodgers broke his arm today, who would you feel more comfortable with guiding the packers for the next 8 weeks, Garcia or Flynn?

The national football post  has a rumour that we might bring in Joey Harrington. If that's the case I'd definitely rather have Garcia:

---

I was a big fan on Harrington. Used to trade him onto my Madden franchise and groom him into a great QB.

Sadly, that's not how it works in the NFL. I would've loved for him to turn into a great QB, but the teams he has played with have never allowed him to show his skills. I think that they might have screwed him up by now.

That said, I think that he can be very solid with the supporting cast that we're offering him. He's only played in shitholes and when he played with a bit less horrible team, he's showed off why he was a high pick. (2007 Atlanta didn't even look like 2008 Atlanta).

I would be totally good with Garcia. I think he's a gamer. I think that those that think Garcia got cut because he wanted to start...I think you are wrong and find that to be goofy thinking.

Those that think Garcia got cut because he was a threat to Russell--I think that it is ok to think that...I think that is what happened also, as strange a concept as that might be...goofy, even.

I think that IF the Pack wants to acquire Garcia, and I think they do...They have a tough decision to make. If they make a move for him prior to the 1st game, they will have to guarantee his salary for the entire year. If they wait until after the beginning of the year, they don't have to guarantee anything.

Will he still be available then?

Tough decision, that's what I think, and I am done with the whole thinking thing and going back to my regularly scheduled not thinking.

Err.. considering what we have right now, I'd be happy with either Garcia or Harrington as a backup.

---