DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago

Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Great post + 1
TheOldMan
14 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"longtimefan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!
Truth be known, I'm TT's baby!
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago

Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.

"DakotaT" wrote:




Someone will characterize this optimism as baiting, but I'll just give it a +1.

Not to say I don't have some concerns, but at this point I can either just piss and moan because things didn't go exactly as I wished they would, or I can concentrate on what IS and root for my favorite football team.
blank
14 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"TheOldMan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!

"TheOldMan" wrote:



If you look at their entire body of work? Of course not.

Just looking at 2008? Or looking ahead to 2009? Not exactly a laugh-worthy argument.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"TheOldMan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!

"TheOldMan" wrote:




He didn't say anything of the sort, and anyone without a transparent agenda can see that.

Seriously, is anyone aware that Rodgers could be a very good QB for the Packers with a very good career and still not achieve Brett's success? And the Packers could win that way? I'd like someone to explain why he has to be every bit as good as his predecessor, other than it's what some seriously delusional fans expect.
blank
dd80forever
14 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"TheOldMan" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was MM's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.
blank
longtimefan
14 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"dd80forever" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That was worth of a high 5 and chest bump D80


I cant disagree at all with what you said

You guys hate Ted .......AWESOME we get it and thats your choice

But like this post of yours, you were unbiased and said what I long to hear from people that are ted haters..Which is...

Treat Brett and Rodgers equally PER GAME/PER SEASON...

Brett has had the best career EVER..So you cant judge Rodgers agiasnt that



THANK YOU
wils0646
14 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"dd80forever" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's a good post.

I don't think you'll find a single person on here saying Rodgers wasn't at fault for the 6-10 record. I just don't think he was a problem that needed to be addressed. I also don't think he was even close to the main reason why we ended up 6-10.

The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.



I don't think that it is this simple. Remember, Brett's "good" gave us a 4-12 record. The other poor parts of the team played more of a factor than Brett or Aaron in '05 and '08, respectively.

The thing I don't like about this post is that you're basically giving no credit to Ted Thompson for the 13-3 record while Brett receives it all. It was you who basically said that the team as a whole contributes to the record. The person who built the 13-3 team is Ted Thompson. I just would like you to acknowledge that Ted Thompson had a lot to do with '07, as did Brett.
The Pack Will Be Back.
dfosterf
14 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"longtimefan" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"dd80forever" wrote:



That was worth of a high 5 and chest bump D80


I cant disagree at all with what you said

You guys hate Ted .......AWESOME we get it and thats your choice

But like this post of yours, you were unbiased and said what I long to hear from people that are ted haters..Which is...

Treat Brett and Rodgers equally PER GAME/PER SEASON...

Brett has had the best career EVER..So you cant judge Rodgers agiasnt that



THANK YOU

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Lots of lessons in there.

Treat everyone with the dignity of a thoughtful post and it just might get read... and not jumped on .

I disagree strongly with several of Andy's points, but I certainly read and understood what he was trying to say, and further appreciated where he is coming from.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (5h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
    Zero2Cool (12h) : Haha
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
    beast (14h) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
    dfosterf (17h) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
    Zero2Cool (19h) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
    dfosterf (19h) : Against tbd
    dfosterf (19h) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
    dfosterf (19h) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
    Zero2Cool (19h) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Ugh... kids these days!
    dfosterf (20h) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
    dfosterf (20h) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
    dfosterf (20h) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
    dfosterf (21h) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
    Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
    Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
    beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
    beast (25-Mar) : Simply fined in the week to follow
    beast (25-Mar) : I agree with one NFL official, it'll probably be like some of the helmets hits, not really called by the refs on the field but simply fined
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Hip drop is not. Super confusing. Referees job is harder
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Swivel hip drop is banned
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : The hip drop enforcement will be in the form of fines, etc. Not flags
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : A major foul will be enforced on the offense if there are offsetting penalties in a change of possession situation
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Teams will receive a 3rd challenge if 1 was successful. Previously, it took 2
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.