buckeyepackfan
8 years ago

Raji?

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



O-line?

😝 😝 😝 😝
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
texaspackerbacker
8 years ago

Raji?

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Oops ....... I have to give you that one. You probably could dig up stuff on Brad Jones and maybe Hawk too. The O Line, though, is a category. I don't think I ever bad-mouthed any individual O Lineman, not even Newhouse.

Mark my words: Janis is gonna have a good game and probably score at least one TD against KC - IF he actually does play a lot of snaps.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Zero2Cool
8 years ago
None of you get a life. Just post smart stuff on PackersHome.com
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
8 years ago

Oops ....... I have to give you that one. You probably could dig up stuff on Brad Jones and maybe Hawk too. The O Line, though, is a category. I don't think I ever bad-mouthed any individual O Lineman, not even Newhouse.

Mark my words: Janis is gonna have a good game and probably score at least one TD against KC - IF he actually does play a lot of snaps.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



The O-line IS a unit!
You say how shitty they are, fact is the inner 3 are fast becoming the best in the league.
The Packers knew going into the last game they we're going to have trouble with the Seahawks d-line on the outside.
What you call "Aaron running for his life", is actually game planned in.

Aaron took advantage of the lanes the middle 3 opened up, and the aggresiveness of Bennet.

The Seahawks NEVER blitzed the whole game.

I think you will find this week's game to be different.

KC is An aggressive, blitzing team.

I'm betting Kuhn will see more time in the backfield to help in protection and The Packers will run more screens and misdirection.
(already said that)

Janis may benefit from this (if he plays) , by getting single coverage on some go routes.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DarkaneRules
8 years ago
Well I am expecting less than 40 total points between teams this Monday. I see pressure on both QBs effecting the points total.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
PackerTraxx
8 years ago

This is LONG overdue. If he ever gets in there, they will never get him out.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Tex I really hope you're right on this one. A deep threat with our O would be huge, we don't have one now. It would keep D's from crowding the line.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
texaspackerbacker
8 years ago

The O-line IS a unit!
You say how shitty they are, fact is the inner 3 are fast becoming the best in the league.
The Packers knew going into the last game they we're going to have trouble with the Seahawks d-line on the outside.
What you call "Aaron running for his life", is actually game planned in.

Aaron took advantage of the lanes the middle 3 opened up, and the aggresiveness of Bennet.

The Seahawks NEVER blitzed the whole game.

I think you will find this week's game to be different.

KC is An aggressive, blitzing team.

I'm betting Kuhn will see more time in the backfield to help in protection and The Packers will run more screens and misdirection.
(already said that)

Janis may benefit from this (if he plays) , by getting single coverage on some go routes.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Yes, the O Line is a unit - even though you go on to talk about the "inner 3" hahaha. At times in the past few years, that unit has been shitty - in the sense that Aaron Rodgers has to scramble and throw from outside the pocket (or where a pocket should be) on virtually every pass play and in the sense that way too often, our RBs don't have a hole to run through. This season, they have been a little bit better run blocking and no worse pass blocking. Just the same, though, if Aaron Rodgers wasn't so damn good at escaping and making plays, our O Line would be exposed as far from what you'd expect with a top level team. Is that criticizing the players? I don't know; The coaching? maybe some; The GM who built the team and gave us Aaron Rodgers? That's a taboo subject hahahaha. But the play of the O Line, it is what it is - probably good enough to win it all with Aaron Rodgers at QB.

The topic of this thread is Janis, though. Yeah, I don't doubt he will benefit from single coverage - MORE than any of the alternative WRs we could put on the field. He will also benefit from having the best QB in the history of the NFL throwing to him, but then you can say the same for any Packer receiver. I don't know about you detractors of Janis, but I'd rather see the ball in his hands after catching it 20 yards down field than somebody slower - even if that somebody didn't have a leg injury.

And I almost forgot the other point I was gonna make: Aaron Rodgers eats blitzes for lunch. Seattle was smart not to blitz. If KC chooses to blitz, bring it on!
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
steveishere
8 years ago

Yes, the O Line is a unit - even though you go on to talk about the "inner 3" hahaha. At times in the past few years, that unit has been shitty - in the sense that Aaron Rodgers has to scramble and throw from outside the pocket (or where a pocket should be) on virtually every pass play and in the sense that way too often, our RBs don't have a hole to run through. This season, they have been a little bit better run blocking and no worse pass blocking. Just the same, though, if Aaron Rodgers wasn't so damn good at escaping and making plays, our O Line would be exposed as far from what you'd expect with a top level team. Is that criticizing the players? I don't know; The coaching? maybe some; The GM who built the team and gave us Aaron Rodgers? That's a taboo subject hahahaha. But the play of the O Line, it is what it is - probably good enough to win it all with Aaron Rodgers at QB.

The topic of this thread is Janis, though. Yeah, I don't doubt he will benefit from single coverage - MORE than any of the alternative WRs we could put on the field. He will also benefit from having the best QB in the history of the NFL throwing to him, but then you can say the same for any Packer receiver. I don't know about you detractors of Janis, but I'd rather see the ball in his hands after catching it 20 yards down field than somebody slower - even if that somebody didn't have a leg injury.

And I almost forgot the other point I was gonna make: Aaron Rodgers eats blitzes for lunch. Seattle was smart not to blitz. If KC chooses to blitz, bring it on!

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Rodgers scrambling does not automatically mean the offensive line was bad. Last year he held the ball on average over 5 and a half seconds before he scrambled which was the 5th longest time in the NFL. I'm not one of those people who is negative about Rodgers "holding the ball too long" because he does amazing things when he does it but the fact is he does hold the ball for a long time typically which gives defenders more time to get to him which means defenders are going to reach him more often regardless of how well the line does.

Saying he had to run out of the pocket sometimes therefore the line was bad without adding any context to it is meaningless.
beast
8 years ago

None of you get a life. Just post smart stuff on PackersHome.com

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



No thanks, I've heard too many Packers addicted crazy people post there! 🤣
UserPostedImage
beast
8 years ago

This is LONG overdue. If he ever gets in there, they will never get him out.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



They had him there (as the 4th WR) after Jordy went down...

and they didn't like it so they brought in James Jones to make him the 5th WR again...

Adams went down so he became the 4th WR for a short period of time.
Janis has a ton of physical potential, but he still doesn't play up to that physical potential... hopefully another offseason or two and he'll have a huge breakout and who knows, maybe replace Nelson. But until that happens it seems like he's best as a 5th WR.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (1h) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Went to a Titans board. One comment there. Not very long. I quote: "LOL" They don't sound overly upset about our aquisition.
beast (18-Apr) : OT Dillard has been absolutely horrible... like OG Newman levels
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Suit him up and have him stand in front of the big board as a draft day cautionary tale.
Zero2Cool (18-Apr) : Packers sign T Andre Dillard.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : Adds most of the information this time of year comes from agents.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : @RealAlexBarth Bill Belichick says accurate draft information doesn't leak from teams until about 12 hours before the draft. Adds most of th
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : I am very happy that for moment, Jordan Love seems like a normal human being
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Belichick * whatever
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "There's a lot of depth at Offensive Tackle and Wide Receiver." Bill Bellichick
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Thanks! I can't believe it's over haha
Martha Careful (16-Apr) : Congratulations
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Boom. Student Loan. $0.00. Only took about 20 years.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : Packers DT Kenny Clark: New defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley will 'allow us to be way more disruptive'
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Saints have agreed to terms on a contract with former Packers wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown.
beast (12-Apr) : No, but of it's for legislation, then half of the country will find it evil, not good, whatever it says....
Mucky Tundra (12-Apr) : Draft is still 2 weeks away. UGH
dhazer (11-Apr) : Does anyone know of a good AI generator to create letters of Support for legislation?
Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : Gordon "Red" Batty retires as equipment manager
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Sounds like that's pretty certain now.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Packers "at" Eagles in Brazil. Week One
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Va' Fazer As Malas Va' !
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy tipping us off?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : “We’re either the first- or second-most popular team in Brazil.”
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Christian Watson got married. Wife better be careful with those hamstrings!! 😂😂
dfosterf (9-Apr) : Those poor bastards
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Falcons have signed former Packers CB Kevin King, who has been out of football since 2021.
dfosterf (8-Apr) : Collectively, we need to spend more time in what we have, when analyzing ostendible needs and historical proclivities
dfosterf (8-Apr) : I say he is better than so many of these draft picks
dfosterf (8-Apr) : Question of the week for me: Has anyone besides me done any deep dive into the potential of Alex McGough, our 3rd string qb?
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Or in Tunsil's case, something gets released day of draft or day before lol
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Seems every year someone does something pre-draft.
dfosterf (8-Apr) : Falling down drunk. The draft board
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

21-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.