Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:49:45 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,284
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 77

Quote:
12. Green Bay Packers (21st)

PassB: 3rd,
RunB: 26th,
PEN: 16th

Stud: How would Josh Sitton fare switching to left guard? The +33.1 grade should tell you. Ending the season with just one negatively graded game (Week 1) he was the model of consistency, allowing just eight quarterback disruptions all year.

Dud: He only played 250 snaps, yet that was enough time for Marshall Newhouse (-9.2) to show everyone the team made the right move in benching him.

Analysis: The strength of the unit remains the interior where besides Sitton, T.J. Lang had an encouraging year if somewhat lacking on the consistency front. Evan Dietrich-Smith was perhaps the biggest surprise as he likely locked down the starting centers job for a long time and it leaves the line in good shape. David Bakhtiari was hardly a disaster and with Bryan Bulaga to return, the team suddenly has some real depth.
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline play2win  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 8:20:09 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,783
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee

Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724

I'm actually pretty excited for this OL development, especially with Bulaga returning to what I would imagine to be RT. If we re-sign EDS, which I think we will, this could be very good moving forward. Lang's play suffered with the Newhouse/Barclay thing happening next to him. Solid play from Bulaga could make all the difference in the world.

I'm also looking forward to seeing what Tretter can do at C, possibly in a backup role, possibly as a starter… Regardless, this is encouraging. With Mike McCarthy having an entire year with the 1-2 punch of Lacy and Starks, I think he came around to how to run the football with authority. At least, he's closer than he was last year and the year before. We should be much improved next season.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
yooperfan on 1/15/2014(UTC), wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 8:22:10 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352

I can't see how our line ranked that high pass blocking and that low run blocking? If we had the 3rd best oline pass blocking there must be some really shitty pass blocking olines. And if we were that bad in run blocking (with two backs averaging 4 and 5 ypc) there are some really great run blocking Olines.

I would expect us to be 10-15th in both.
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC), DoddPower on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Online wpr  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:21:11 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,344
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,745
Applause Received: 1,315

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins Go to Quoted Post
I can't see how our line ranked that high pass blocking and that low run blocking? If we had the 3rd best oline pass blocking there must be some really shitty pass blocking olines. And if we were that bad in run blocking (with two backs averaging 4 and 5 ypc) there are some really great run blocking Olines.

I would expect us to be 10-15th in both.


Agreed. They gave up 45 sacks. That is 9th most. I don't care how many yards Aaron throws for (which I have to assume it a plus for the OL) you can't be 3rd best passing line with that many sacks. And then there are the pressures and hurries and hits to factor in. Aaron may not have taken the sack but he was pressured and had to scramble a whole bunch of times. Those should be negatives for the line not positives.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Offline Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:27:00 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,639
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,838
Applause Received: 1,993

Keep in mind that ProFootballFocus doesn't place every sack onto the OL. They analyze each play and assign the sack to where it should go. And Aaron Rodgers deserves a lot of blame for a lot of the sacks. Personally, anytime he holds the ball for more than 3 seconds and it's a sack I would say it's on him. You need to get rid of the dang ball. If Aaron isn't intelligent enough to get through his reads faster, maybe he should do less commercials and spend more time watching film.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
thanks Post received 3 applause.
nerdmann on 1/15/2014(UTC), wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC), buckeyepackfan on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Online steveishere  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:34:01 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Posts: 1,548
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 38
Applause Received: 798

Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
Agreed. They gave up 45 sacks. That is 9th most. I don't care how many yards Aaron throws for (which I have to assume it a plus for the OL) you can't be 3rd best passing line with that many sacks. And then there are the pressures and hurries and hits to factor in. Aaron may not have taken the sack but he was pressured and had to scramble a whole bunch of times. Those should be negatives for the line not positives.


According to their charts our OL allowed the least amount of "hurries" and 6th least total "hits" on QB but the 8th most sacks (they attribute some of the sacks to the QB if they do something like hold the ball too long or run into a sack). So they didn't often give up pressures but they were turned into sacks at a high rate. I have to say I feel like that's pretty accurate. We had great pass blocking up the middle this year for the most part. Bakhtiari improved a lot throughout the year and Barclay was the only player on the line who wasn't really very good at any point and 1 position struggling can usually be mitigated. I also think the game plan this year (especially with Flynn) was to throw more quick passes and that also contributed. Also Bakhtiari I usually thought was solid for the most part but when he got beat he got beat quickly.

This certainly doesn't show that our line was great this year by any means and I'm sure you could find many flaws in the charting but maybe some here could concede that the line was possibly better in comparison to the rest of the NFL teams than their perception of it was.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC), Rockmolder on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Online wpr  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:46:29 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,344
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,745
Applause Received: 1,315

Thanks guys. Good explanations.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Offline texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:54:10 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Posts: 2,527
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 224

I wonder exactly how they do judge things.

Our O-Line absolutely does NOT pass the eye test. Contrary to silly remarks blaming Aaron Rodgers for what amounts to caution about avoiding interceptions, the only reason our O-Line did not fare a LOT worse in terms of sacks is the escapability of our illustrious QB.

26th in run blocking sounds about right based on what we see virtually every time Lacy tries to run outside and even on inside runs when the opponent's D is not looking for the pass.

Josh Sitton is good, and EDS and Lang had decent seasons, but I question whether they are as good as their ranking. Could it be that the interior gets higher ratings against the pass rush because it is so pathetically easy to beat our OTs that opponents don't emphasize coming up the middle? Could it be that Rodgers is good enough at getting away from center quickly that an outside rush makes more sense?

I don't see much help on the way for our O-Line - other than the HOPE of Bulaga returning to decency and the long shot hope of Sherrod playing like a first rounder. I don't have much hope for Bakhtiari improving significantly. Just the same, maybe good enough is good enough. With Rodgers, and now Lacy, we STILL ought to be able to outscore just about anybody just about anytime, especially if they snap out this idiotic trend of trying to run on early downs.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:03:00 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,639
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,838
Applause Received: 1,993

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
I wonder exactly how they do judge things.


Click me and wonder no more.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Online steveishere  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:20:38 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Posts: 1,548
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 38
Applause Received: 798

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
I wonder exactly how they do judge things.

Our O-Line absolutely does NOT pass the eye test. Contrary to silly remarks blaming Aaron Rodgers for what amounts to caution about avoiding interceptions, the only reason our O-Line did not fare a LOT worse in terms of sacks is the escapability of our illustrious QB.



Maybe you should get your eyes checked. Our illustrious and escapable QB didn't play half the season and there wasn't a big difference between pressure and sacks whether Rodgers, Flynn, Tolzien or Wallace were QB so I guess we had 4 illustrious QBs.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:34:17 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Posts: 2,527
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 224

Originally Posted by: steveishere Go to Quoted Post
Maybe you should get your eyes checked. Our illustrious and escapable QB didn't play half the season and there wasn't a big difference between pressure and sacks whether Rodgers, Flynn, Tolzien or Wallace were QB so I guess we had 4 illustrious QBs.


And you would actually claim that ANY of those QBs were given any reasonable time to throw? not running for their lives virtually every pass play? Come on!
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:01:58 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 219
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)

Applause Given: 64
Applause Received: 100

PFF can use scientific charting, stats and all the specific examples they want. They don't know anything compared to us fans and our 'eye test'. :)
blank
thanks Post received 1 applause.
buckeyepackfan on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Online steveishere  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:04:51 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Posts: 1,548
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 38
Applause Received: 798

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
And you would actually claim that ANY of those QBs were given any reasonable time to throw? not running for their lives virtually every pass play? Come on!


None of those QBs were running for their lives on virtually every pass play except for Flynn in the Detroit game.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error



Recent Topics
8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nyrpack

7h / Around The NFL / yooperfan

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

22h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.