Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nerdmann  
#31 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:54:16 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,629
Applause Received: 652

We've still got Bostick.

Although I guess they don't think he's ready yet.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline wpr  
#32 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:58:16 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,030
Applause Received: 1,467

Originally Posted by: yooperfan Go to Quoted Post
Green Bay football is reality football not fantasy football.
The reality is Ted Thompson is General Manager of the Packers.
Why waste your time fantasizing about these trades.
Not going to happen folks!


yoop it looks like some guys enjoy watching a pole dancer for 2 hours then go home and taking an ice cold shower. Shrug

UserPostedImage

thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 10/11/2013(UTC)
Offline DakotaT  
#33 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:13:40 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 661
Applause Received: 1,360

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
We've still got Bostick.

Although I guess they don't think he's ready yet.


They should give Bostick some playing time, cause the other guys aren't doing jack. I've watched Taylor and Quarless miss gimme balls and of course Finley always has his moments. Our offense required production from the TE position.
UserPostedImage
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#34 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:51:40 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Location: Hanover Park, IL

Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 178

We don't need to trade for anybody. We got depth at every position except Saftey. Saftey I would trade for. But the Packers never will.
Offline sschind  
#35 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:04:20 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 117
Applause Received: 422

Originally Posted by: beast Go to Quoted Post
You make that sound like a bad thing... if a player is making plays then they should be getting the ball. And you can have more than one TE on the field at a time.



Because they can't catch the ball... and not making plays when they get their chances. Lets be honest, Gonzales and Finley both would.



If they are throwing the ball to Gonzo a lot then Finley will become like the rest of our guys. Mike McCarthy does not run an offense like Bill B. did with Hernandez and Gronkowski. If we had Finley and Gonzales one of them would be wasted. Frankly I would rather have the draft pick than a guy who would be done after this year (most likely.) Especially if that guy won't have much of an impact which I don't think he would.
I respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
Offline beast  
#36 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:00:38 AM(UTC)
beast

Rank: Pro Bowl

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 250
Applause Received: 312

Originally Posted by: steveishere Go to Quoted Post
No different than bringing in a legit #4 WR


You're right on the money, it'd be nice to be able to play Gonzo, Finley, Nelson and Cobb right now with Jones being out and Ross cut.

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
If we had Finley and Gonzales one of them would be wasted.


Sounds like you're saying Mike McCarthy doesn't know how to use two good TEs.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
They should give Bostick some playing time, cause the other guys aren't doing jack.


They should have him practicing at WR because that's what he is. A huge, slow WR (which is fast for a TE). And he could help fill in for Jones if he's injury for a while.
America's team Of the people by the people for the people Packer People
UserPostedImage
~ madeby ~ pack93z ~
Offline DoddPower  
#37 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:23:39 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,040
Applause Received: 514

I know Cleveland isn't trading him, but Gordon would look especially good in Green and Gold at this point.
Offline beast  
#38 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:40:33 PM(UTC)
beast

Rank: Pro Bowl

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 250
Applause Received: 312

Originally Posted by: DoddPower Go to Quoted Post
I know Cleveland isn't trading him, but Gordon would look especially good in Green and Gold at this point.


I strongly doubt the Browns would be willing to trade Gordon.


Giants seem to be listening to offers for WR Hakeem Nicks, who they haven't been able to work out a long term deal with (at least not yet).


Jags seem to be listening to all offers on any of their players, sounds like they're trying to trade RB Jones-Drew ("at the right price") and they have seem to have a love/hate relationship with WR Justin Blackmon. Love his talent but sounds like they might be having some problems with him off the field. I doubt they'd be willing to trade him, because they seem to love his potential, but maybe they could ask about him.
America's team Of the people by the people for the people Packer People
UserPostedImage
~ madeby ~ pack93z ~
Offline nerdmann  
#39 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:43:44 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,629
Applause Received: 652

Brandon Lloyd?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#40 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:44:22 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,040
Applause Received: 514

Originally Posted by: beast Go to Quoted Post
I strongly doubt the Browns would be willing to trade Gordon.


Giants seem to be listening to offers for WR Hakeem Nicks, who they haven't been able to work out a long term deal with (at least not yet).


Jags seem to be listening to all offers on any of their players, sounds like they're trying to trade RB Jones-Drew ("at the right price") and they have seem to have a love/hate relationship with WR Justin Blackmon. Love his talent but sounds like they might be having some problems with him off the field. I doubt they'd be willing to trade him, because they seem to love his potential, but maybe they could ask about him.


Yeah, I'm just saying it would be nice! Justin Blackmon is a beast, I can't imagine him going anywhere. He could very likely be the Packers best WR if he was on this team. Nicks is good, but he's pretty disappointing a lot of time, too. But still, he'd obviously be better Boykin et al.

Hopefully James Jones can come back soon. If so, the Packers still have weapons, especially if they can keep improving their run game. I wouldn't expect any big moves if Jones comes back. If both are done for the season, it's going to be a long rest of the season, probably.

Offline sschind  
#41 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:09:10 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 117
Applause Received: 422

Blackmon or Gordon would be awesome in Green Bay but I highly doubt either of them will be going anywhere. I know the Jags and Browns front office haven't been stellar but I doubt even they would be stupid enough to trade away their best playmakers.

If we get any Cleveland WR maybe we can trade for Charles Johnson.
I respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
Offline nerdmann  
#42 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:16:36 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,629
Applause Received: 652

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
Blackmon or Gordon would be awesome in Green Bay but I highly doubt either of them will be going anywhere. I know the Jags and Browns front office haven't been stellar but I doubt even they would be stupid enough to trade away their best playmakers.

If we get any Cleveland WR maybe we can trade for Charles Johnson.


Cleveland is rebuilding. They traded away Trent Richardson.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#43 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:18:40 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,040
Applause Received: 514

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Cleveland is rebuilding. They traded away Trent Richardson.


They specifically said they aren't trading Josh Gordon, and considering he's putting up big numbers every week, I don't doubt them. Now, I'm sure they would for the right price, but it would probably take a first for it to happen. They spent a high 2nd round pick on him, anyway, so it really wouldn't make any sense for them to trade him, considering he's so young.
Offline sschind  
#44 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 7:40:35 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 117
Applause Received: 422

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Cleveland is rebuilding. They traded away Trent Richardson.


Richardson was not the player that Gordon is. Yeah they are rebuilding but I doubt they would want to start totally from scratch. Gordon is their biggest playmaker on offense by far. Without Richardson the Browns need at least two pieces to their offensive puzzle (QB and RB) they would be stupid to trade Gordon and have to find a third. Espescially when they still need a legit #2 WR.

I'm not saying they won't do it, just that they would be stupid if they did.

I respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 10/14/2013(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Pack93z

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / GermanGilbert

23-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / AbbaGav

23-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan