Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:17:15 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,925
Applause Received: 1,416

Seifert wrote:
In perusing your comments and my Twitter mentions, it seems your interest in the Minnesota Vikings' latest stadium delay is twofold:

Is the 2012 stadium agreement in jeopardy, putting the team back in play to move to Los Angeles?
Could the delay push back the projected stadium debut in August 2016?


Based on my understanding of the situation as it stands now, there is no reason to believe the agreement will unravel or even be put up for re-negotiation. State leaders are acting as if they are nervous about the outcome of a New Jersey civil case involving the Wilf family, but in reality all they have done is ask for a certification of the financing behind the Vikings' $477 million commitment to the project.

The second issue is a bit more complicated. Groundbreaking is tentatively scheduled for late October or early November, and disassembly of the Metrodome will begin no later than February 2014. Once that is complete, there is a 30-month timetable for construction of the new stadium.

The chairwoman of the Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority has said the review and certification of the Wilfs' finances will take a matter of weeks. If that's the case, my understanding is that the stadium opening won't be impacted. But if it takes longer, the question becomes more difficult to address.

Lester Bagley, the Vikings' vice president of public affairs and stadium development, wouldn't comment on the tight timetable but reiterated the team has asked the authority to proceed with stadium work during the inquiry.

"If we delay [too long]," Bagley said, "this thing will end up costing everybody more money."

For now, at least, this episode appears to be more a matter of politics and base-covering than one of substance.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Sponsor
 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.081 seconds.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / cheeseheads123

4h / Random Babble / DakotaT

4h / Random Babble / DakotaT

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

11h / Random Babble / wpr

11h / Random Babble / wpr


Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.