Mitt Romney or Barrack Obama?· Page 28

4PackGirl
Registered

11 years ago

#271

Sometimes you guys act like such girls.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

now that right there is an offensive remark!! [grin1]

Wade
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#272

Coming from a guy that can't think past the end of his nose, this is not even an insult. Can't wait for that stupid Tparty to obliverated from national politics.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

The "Republican" wing of the tea party, maybe.

But the Sam Adams wing is only going to grow.

Which of course would get us perilously close to your "guillotine" story coming actually about, since today's Americans are closer to the illiterate French peasants of 1789 than they have been to the highly literate Adams and Paine, and their national "leaders" closer to Robispierre than to Jefferson.

Methinks it is time to sell part of the fountain pen collection and find somewhere where I can spend a couple weekends a month at a shooting range. Wants v. needs, right, zombieslayer?

Crap.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

11 years ago

#273

My brother says: "Romney spent $800m+ to not be President. I spent nothing for the same result. Who's the better business man now?"

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#274

My brother says: "Romney spent $800m+ to not be President. I spent nothing for the same result. Who's the better business man now?"

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Should we consider, that it wasn't his money?

I need to figure out how to get people to pay for me to travel the country doing nothing but talking and sight seeing.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Cheesey
Preferred Member

11 years ago

#275

It's funny how my name gets mentioned when i'm not here.
I wasn't here cause i can't afford computer hookup at home.

Obama won.....let's see how happy all his supporters will be 4 years from now. He already proved he didn't have to follow through on ANY of his promises and still got reelected.
He, the Clintons, and all their hollywood supporters ARE the "rich guys" his supporters rail on about. But he fooled you all into thinking he's "one of us".
Obama is a lame duck pres, and now doesn't have to worry about consequences to his actions, as he doesn't have to worry about reelection.
It will be interesting to see how far left he will take the country now.

Formo
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#276

OoOoOoOOoOH, lemmie break this down for you in cute, little bite sizes pieces so you can understand..

Holy shit are you retarded.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Maybe, but far less than you, and apparently 99% of 'Merica, sir.

Go cry in your beer for four more year.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

My sobriety says this is impossible. But, I will cry in my drink, but much to your dismay, I would have cried in my drink the same if Romney won. Sooo.. Your point?

Your asstard racist tea party has been slapped and sent to bed.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

What?! You mean the Republicans have been slapped and sent to bed. It was the political game-playing GOP that lost this race, not the Tea Partiers. I'll ignore the racist comment to prevent further spreading of the flame-fest.

And yes, Obama's landslide victory last night made losers out of Superpacks.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

50% of the SuperPACs. The Democrats and Obama get just as much money from them as the GOP does.

Can you say rope-a-dope - cause those billionairs got knocked the fuck out last night. Let them cry like the pussy bitches that they are.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Rope-a-dope. Yup. I can say it. Again, pointless sentences.

Fuck you Porforis.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Haha!

I stood alone the last two years against all of you and took more shit than anybody.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

HAHAH!! No, you haven't.

If you can't take that I'm right on certain things, go examine your own head.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

OMG, you keep getting funnier, sir! The only thing you are right on is how lucky you are with your family. I envy you in that aspect. And only that aspect.

Yeah, I'm gonna gloat today. This president has taken more shit from uneducated people that do not respect his office, and I'm happy for him today.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Gloat. It's your freedom to do so. This president has earned much of the shit thrown his way. And maybe some from those who do not respect his office, but guarantee you that most is from those who DO, which why they give him shit.

No it means you Fox News watchers live in a bubble. Nothing gets in.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Everyone of us that you call 'Fox News watchers' don't watch Fox News. Generalizations are bad, mmmk?

Ann Coulter once wrote a book "How to talk to a liberal if you have to." Those roles have now been reversed, only the new book should be called "Why would you even talk to a Tea Party person?"

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Ignorance is bliss, right?

My brother says: "Romney spent $800m+ to not be President. I spent nothing for the same result. Who's the better business man now?"

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

This made me LOL.

One more thing unrelated to the above: If you voted for Obama OR Romney.. Congratulations. You are a part of the problem, NOT the solution. Sheeple.

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!

Cheesey
Preferred Member

11 years ago

#277

Isn't it funny how childish some people act?

Seriously, had Romney won, i wouldn't have been throwing insults at the posters here that love Obama.
Last i checked, (as of today, that is) it's still a free country, and we are free to vote for who we want to vote for.
The "na na, my guy won, your guy lost" reminds me more of the trolls that used to come here when their team beat the Packers.
That's where that kind of stuff belongs.

As i said in many posts, Obama did NOT follow through on his promises from the last 4 years. So i think we pretty much know what his plans are for the next 4 years.
If i'm wrong on this, i haven't seen anything to prove otherwise.

If that was what you wanted, well, you got it. The national debt will probably be well over 20 trillion dollars by the end of his next term. Maybe even higher. I sure haven't seen anything that would make me believe otherwise.

The funny thing is.....i don't have any children, so i don't HAVE to "care" where the country will be in 30 years. I'll probably be dead, so why should i care?
But you people that have young children SHOULD have seen what Obama did as far as the debt goes, and been concerned how it will affect YOUR children's future. I guess that's what surprises me the most.

But hey.....you will get what you asked for in the end.

Wade
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#278

Sometimes you guys act like such girls.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

You're the one who's staring at our legs.

[grin1]

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

doddpower
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#279

50% of the SuperPACs. The Democrats and Obama get just as much money from them as the GOP does.

Originally Posted by: Formo

Are you sure about that? I've certainly heard differently. I quickly found one article, perhaps it's wrong. I've definitely heard the same thing on other news networks as well. I'm sure they were all just a bunch of lying liberals though. Source :

WASHINGTON -- Independent conservative groups are going to have to come to terms with the fact that they spent more than $700 million -- 70 percent of all of the reported independent spending in the 2012 election -- and walked away with little to show for it.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney was supported by outside groups that outspent allies of President Barack Obama by $260 million. And yet he still lost.

Huffington Post wrote:

There's obviously absolutely no doubt they both received a ton of outside money, and it's truly embarrassing and humiliating how much money was spent (as I stated earlier). However, it was true that Democrats were generally against Citizens United, including Obama. It was a huge deal and those opposed to it continually stated why there were against it: Because it would result in unimaginable amounts of money poured into campaigns. Romney certainly got out to an early lead, and naturally Democrats/Obama had no choice but to follow. It's also true that Romney's donations were much more concentrated to a few HUGE donors. Obama had his share of big donors relatively speaking, but his campaign was much more grassroots and involved many, many more smaller donors. I don't have time to find a link now, but there were at least a few individuals that donated $100 million + to the Romney campaign (Koch brothers, et al.). He literally crushed Obama in terms of 'big time donors.' It's also interesting that only 12% of Obama's money came from Super Pacs, which basically means undisclosed donors, vs. 40% per Romney.

Quickly came across this blurb:

Romney and his allies spent $1.2 billion on the race, compared with $1 billion spent by Obama and his allies, according to a POLITICO analysis of records on Federal Election Commission data and public statements. Nearly 40 percent of Team Romney’s spending came from super PACs and other unlimited outside money groups, compared with about 12 percent for Team Obama.

But the final tally for 2012 might never be known because some of the biggest spending outfits, particularly on the right, are nonprofit groups that are allowed to keep their donors and many details of their spending a secret from the public.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83534.html#ixzz2BfXy26M8

Politico wrote:

The last sentence of that quote is exactly why Republicans and several Democrats wanted Citizen United to pass: because it allowed them to keep their donors a secret. Perhaps some don't have any problem with that, but certainly many others do. Obama clearly benefited from Super Pacs, but at least he acted like he didn't want it in the public eye. Besides, that's all most politicians do is act anyway; only some do it better than others.

Either way, it's absolutely inexcusable how much money was spent on this election and I have little to no respect for either campaign as a result. I agree, American politics, especially the Presidential race, is a complete joke. It's too bad so many still buy into the facade, though. It's becoming little more than a theatrical show meant to divide America and give them a false sense of a "choice" about the direction of the Country. Unfortunately, any Republican or Democrat elected to office in the foreseeable future is largely going to pursue similar agendas regardless of what is said in front of a camera. Any small differences that exist are minimal, and almost all decisions are not good for us 'average Joe's and Joelene's." Moreover, both parties in America are criminals, as far as I'm concerned.

DakotaT
Select Member

11 years ago

#280

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

I like how people like you think Obama accomplished nothing in his first four years. It's actually laughable how right wingers dismiss things like affordable health care, kicking Arab terrorist ass, repealed don't ask don't tell, saved the auto industry, adjusted FEMA so that it works; and all while treasonous Republicans tried blocking everything.

The economy isn't fixed yet, but don't you think if the treasonous Republicans would have helped pass a jobs bill, we'd be a lot farther along.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : Packers DT Kenny Clark: New defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley will 'allow us to be way more disruptive'

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Saints have agreed to terms on a contract with former Packers wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown.

beast (12-Apr) : No, but of it's for legislation, then half of the country will find it evil, not good, whatever it says....

Mucky Tundra (12-Apr) : Draft is still 2 weeks away. UGH

dhazer (11-Apr) : Does anyone know of a good AI generator to create letters of Support for legislation?

Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : Gordon "Red" Batty retires as equipment manager

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Sounds like that's pretty certain now.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Packers "at" Eagles in Brazil. Week One

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Va' Fazer As Malas Va' !

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy tipping us off?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : “We’re either the first- or second-most popular team in Brazil.”

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Christian Watson got married. Wife better be careful with those hamstrings!! 😂😂

dfosterf (9-Apr) : Those poor bastards

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Falcons have signed former Packers CB Kevin King, who has been out of football since 2021.

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Collectively, we need to spend more time in what we have, when analyzing ostendible needs and historical proclivities

dfosterf (8-Apr) : I say he is better than so many of these draft picks

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Question of the week for me: Has anyone besides me done any deep dive into the potential of Alex McGough, our 3rd string qb?

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Or in Tunsil's case, something gets released day of draft or day before lol

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Seems every year someone does something pre-draft.

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Falling down drunk. The draft board

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Allright! Potential character guy/f#×k up pickup in D'Vondre Sweat!

Zero2Cool (7-Apr) : Go Badgers!!!

Martha Careful (6-Apr) : Go Boilermakers!!!

Martha Careful (5-Apr) : Diggs has not stepped up in the playoffs and has a high cost

beast (5-Apr) : Probably not going to let Diggs walk away unless he's horrible... but according to reports he also might not be as good as he used to be.

beast (5-Apr) : The 25th pick in the draft has been an offensive player since 2017, 2 TE, 2 WR, 1 RB, 1 OC

Mucky Tundra (5-Apr) : Odd, why give up a 2025 2nd Rounder for him if you're just gonna let him walk?

Zero2Cool (4-Apr) : Texans to let Diggs be free agent in '25

buckeyepackfan (4-Apr) : 49r's aign RB Patrick Taylor.

Martha Careful (4-Apr) : Reversion to the mean would indicate we will keep it

Zero2Cool (4-Apr) : It's also been utilized in a trade in 14 of the past 20 years

Zero2Cool (4-Apr) : The 25th pick in the draft hasn't been made by it's original holder since 2016.

Mucky Tundra (4-Apr) : Gotta imagine that Green Bay vs Houston will be a primetime game this upcoming season

Zero2Cool (3-Apr) : No. Kill QB. No worries. 😁

Mucky Tundra (3-Apr) : Diggs, Collins, Dell and Schultz is gonna be tough to cover

Zero2Cool (3-Apr) : Stefon Diggs' trade will not be processed as a post-June 1 designation, so that is just over $31 million in dead cap this year.

Zero2Cool (3-Apr) : Bills trading WR Stefon Diggs to the Texans in exchange for a 2025 2nd-round pick. (via @rapsheet)

beast (3-Apr) : Using Patterson as RB and RB/WR tweener... so I think they also signed Patterson as a 3rd down RB, not just a kick returner as articles are

beast (3-Apr) : I think PFT missed the real Steelers/Patterson connection, Steelers new OC Arthur Smith has been Patterson's head coach the last 3 years

wpr (2-Apr) : It has Martha. I was stunned when I was in HS to learn Iowa was still playing half court BB in the 70's.

Martha Careful (2-Apr) : Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese...women's sports has come a long way. GREAT TO SEE!!

Martha Careful (31-Mar) : Happy Easter everyone. I hope you all have a great day.

dfosterf (28-Mar) : Maybe

Mucky Tundra (28-Mar) : Yes

Zero2Cool (28-Mar) : No.

Mucky Tundra (28-Mar) : End of a Degu-era

dhazer (28-Mar) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting

Zero2Cool (28-Mar) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.

Zero2Cool (28-Mar) : They do not do it for "content sake".

dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2023 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM

Bears

38 - 20

Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM

Falcons

24 - 25

Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM

SAINTS

18 - 17

Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM

LIONS

20 - 34

Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM

Raiders

13 - 17

Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

17 - 19

Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

10 - 24

Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM

RAMS

20 - 3

Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM

Steelers

19 - 23

Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM

CHARGERS

23 - 20

Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM

Lions

29 - 22

Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM

CHIEFS

27 - 19

Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM

Giants

22 - 24

Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM

BUCCANEERS

20 - 34

Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM

Panthers

33 - 30

Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM

Vikings

33 - 10

Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM

BEARS

17 - 9

Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM

Cowboys

48 - 32

Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM

49ers

21 - 24