flep
14 years ago
The fact is in any match up involving another NFC team against an AFC team you should always want the AFC team to win.

Go Chargers!!!!!!!
Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years
UserPostedImage


I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!
longtimefan
14 years ago

I'm not sure if this is true or not but it might be....


I've read that if the Cowboys lose to the Chargers that means the Packers will be in the NFC's 5th seed at the end of the week no matter what happens in the other 15 games... :magnifyglass: anyone gonna root for the Chargers this week? ... GO CHARGERS :thumbright:

The thought is that if the Cowboys lose then the winner or the Eagles vs Giants game becomes the division leader and the Packers will have a better record than the Cowboys and/or have the head to head tie breaker over the Cowboys.

The only other way for the Packers to get in the 5th seed this week is Packers beat the Bears AND the Giants beat the Eagles.

"beast" wrote:





http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/playoffscenario?algorithm=currentstandings 

Yup if we win and Giants lose we are 5th no matter what anyone else does
DakotaT
14 years ago

I'd rather have the #4 seed. (Still possible)

"IronMan" wrote:




My man, so you're saying you believe in the Viking late season nose dive? What would be even sweeter would be to host the Vikings in Lambeau on a really cold day. We all remember how Brett enjoys the cold games at this juncture in his career.
UserPostedImage
gbpfan
14 years ago
i'm just happy that we will be in the playoffs :icon_smile:
warhawk
14 years ago

What do we need to face the viks instead of the saints?

"Dulak" wrote:



The final six teams will be ranked #1 thru #6.

If we end up the 6th seed and NO is #1 we would play them in the second round by virtue of them getting the lowest team ranked going into that round.

If I am not mistaken we would need to be #5 for sure and the 6th seed would also have to win sending them to NO and us to the Vikes because if the 6th seed were to lose we would be the lowest ranked team left.
"The train is leaving the station."
bozz_2006
14 years ago
that's the way I understand it warhawk. If NO is the #1 seed (and they will be) and the Vikings are #2, we would need to win the first round and not be the lowest seeded team in round two of the playoffs.
UserPostedImage
shield4life
14 years ago
We need to face the Vikings in the first game of playoffs ... If we could get that match up it would be amazing.

The rating of that game would probably be higher then the SB ratings.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
obi1
14 years ago
I am not counting out the Packers for winning out the rest and the Vikings to lose 3 of the next 4.

That gives US the #3 or #4 seed.
blank
Dulak
14 years ago

We need to face the Vikings in the first game of playoffs ... If we could get that match up it would be amazing.

The rating of that game would probably be higher then the SB ratings.

"shield4life" wrote:



ha - you probably right

Id love it too; but want it at home
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

I'd rather have the #4 seed. (Still possible)

"IronMan" wrote:



Honestly I don't think it's possible... because that means the Packers would have to have a better record than the Vikings (which is possible (but unlikely at this point)) AND 3 teams would have better records than Packers...

If the Packers are able to catch and pass the Vikings then they would probably be the #3 or #2 seed...

I'm not sure if this is true or not but it might be....


I've read that if the Cowboys lose to the Chargers that means the Packers will be in the NFC's 5th seed at the end of the week no matter what happens in the other 15 games... :magnifyglass: anyone gonna root for the Chargers this week? ... GO CHARGERS :thumbright:

The thought is that if the Cowboys lose then the winner or the Eagles vs Giants game becomes the division leader and the Packers will have a better record than the Cowboys and/or have the head to head tie breaker over the Cowboys.

The only other way for the Packers to get in the 5th seed this week is Packers beat the Bears AND the Giants beat the Eagles.

"longtimefan" wrote:





http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/playoffscenario?algorithm=currentstandings 

Yup if we win and Giants lose we are 5th no matter what anyone else does

"beast" wrote:



If we win and the Giants lose and the Cowboys win the Packers are still 6th... do you mean if the Cowboys lose?


We need to face the Vikings in the first game of playoffs ... If we could get that match up it would be amazing.

The rating of that game would probably be higher then the SB ratings.

"Dulak" wrote:



ha - you probably right

Id love it too; but want it at home

"shield4life" wrote:



I want to win in their place... to piss them off more... like the Vikings won in GB in the playoffs after being swept by the Packers in the season.....
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (7h) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (9h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (11h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (11h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (14h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (15h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
3h / Around The NFL / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.