Any one want to take a stab at this one?

---

I'd say it was a mixture of the two. The Boys are a great team (as much as I hate to say it). Of course it didn't help that WoodChuck is feeling worse than normal, Bigby's out, KGB isn't feeling up to par, Barnett got banged up early, Al Harris also. I'm not trying to make excuses, per se, but we aren't exactly firing on all cylinders at the moment. I say, more than the alternative, the Cowboys won the game yesterday.

---

The Cows won.

I don't think there's much of a valid argument for the Packers losing.

---

we lost because we didn't produce offencivly d-line may be banged up but they got sacks an interception fumble yes they gave up too but they were getting to romo so pack lost

I think the Cowboys won. They had the clearly better team. And they showed it. It is that simple. They made the Packers look bad. They made ran all over us, and their defensive pressure was too good for our offensive line. Thats what it came down to. They are too good for us. At least right now. Hopefully that changes!

I think it was mostly a case of the Cowboys winning. It's hard to stop a team that runs AND throws the ball as well as they do. There are very few teams in the league at any given time that have that kind of balance and explosiveness on offense. And their defense was much better than what it showed against Philly.

I was impressed by the Cowboys' athleticism pretty much across the board. Their only real weakness is at #2 receiver, as Crayton is not very good, but that no-name guy made two monster catches for them. It's like the Packers needed an extra player on both offense and defense to make it even.

---