MintBaconDrivel
8 years ago
Green Bay Packers ( 5 - 0 )
[list]Total Offense = 10th
Passing Offense = 20th
Rushing Offense = 8th

Total Defense = 7th
Passing Defense = 4th
Rushing Defense = 28th

Points For = 27.4 (5th)
Points Against = 16.2 (3rd)[/list]
UserPostedImage



San Diego Chargers ( 2 - 3 )
[list]Total Offense = 3rd
Passing Offense = 2nd
Rushing Offense = 25th

Total Defense = 15th
Passing Defense = 9th
Rushing Defense = 29th

Points For = 23.2 (16th)
Points Against = 26.8 (23rd)[/list]
UserPostedImage
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
8 years ago
I don't like to take any team for granted, but the Packers should be able to allow some of their key injured players to get a rest and still win this one.
TheKanataThrilla
8 years ago
I think the Vikings provided a good blueprint on how to beat these guys. Get a lot of pressure on Rivers and the DBs play up to their talent.

My one concern Antonio Gates and getting exploited over the middle. If we can keep Gates in check I think we should find ourselves at 6-0 going into the bye.
DarkaneRules
8 years ago
This may be another "pick party". Don't blitz this guy, because like Aaron he can pick you apart.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
beast
8 years ago

Green Bay Packers ( 5 - 0 )
Points For = 27.4 (5th)
Points Against = 16.2 (3rd)[/list]

Originally Posted by: MintBaconDrivel 



Defense is better than the offense! Just like the Packers last two Super Bowl winning years!!!

CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!!!!!!!


QBs win games; Defenses win championships!
UserPostedImage
beast
8 years ago

This may be another "pick party". Don't blitz this guy, because like Aaron he can pick you apart.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 



Their weak point seems to be the OL, you need to apply pressure (if you can do that without blitzing then GREAT!) but if you can't then blitz some.

I think the Steelers problem was they blitzed ALL DAY LONG!!! They weren't mixing it up, so the Chargers figure out it was coming and adjusted. I think if they mixed it up more the Steelers defense would of been even better.

I expect Capers to blitz some early on to try to set a tone, and then back off and see if they can apply pressure without blitzing and if so then let the front guys just go at it... with mixing some blitzing in from time to time but not doing a ton of it unless they're struggling without it.
UserPostedImage
luigis
8 years ago
The Chargers are a good passing team (7th), it's their one and only weapon (run = 24th) so our secondary will be tested for real for the first time in the season. It's specially intriguing to me if we can control the Rivers-Gates combination. You might argue we controlled Graham but Seattle is not using Graham in the same way San Diego uses Gates and the chemistry between Wilson and Graham is close to zero.

The charges have a porous defense, 19 vs the pass and 25 vs the rush. If our offense can't find rhythm at home against San Diego then I will be really worried. I expect Lacy and Starks to work a lot against the Chargers, specially if we can take an early lead.

So it seems we should simple outscore them but careful! We shouldn't fall in our usual "get a lead and then sleep" operation. If we take a lead and force them to pass that's what they do better and they can get close if our defense turns soft.

Packers 31 Chargers 27

Luis
Smokey
8 years ago
IMO, the Packers should do well at home against the Chargers. Any concerns will come from their passing game. The Packers Secondary may be put to the test against this ensemble of "electric warriors" .

I agree with Luigis that Leads + Soft Defense's = Bad Football. Ok, bring in an extra CB to better cover extra wide receivers, don't simply give up 10 to 15 yds. chunks of turf. Playing not to loose is a poor way to play football



Packers - 38

Chargers - 24


[cheers] [cheers] [cheers]
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
8 years ago
Here’s an illustration of the SD OL using Packer players.

They break camp w/ Bulaga, Lang, Linsley, Sitton, Baktieri
Barclay, Rotheram, Gerhardt, Taylor, Walker

Rotheram and Taylor are cut and clear waivers [which Taylor would not] and signed to PS

Lang goes on IR; JD Walton is signed off street and Vujonivich who’d been though last 2 camps; but is on the street because no one signed him is signed.

At Monday night in Pittsburgh: Baktieri and Sitton are out; Bulaga and Linsley shift to guard so best 5 can play, left to right its: Walker, Bulaga, Gerhardt, Linsley, Barclay.

Then during the game Barclay goes out and Walker is moved to LT, so it’s: Vujonivich, Bulaga, Gerhardt, Linsley, Walker.

Then during the game Linsley goes out and he’s replaced by JD Walton, so its Vujonivich, Bulaga, Gerhardt, Walton, Walker.

If we played them Monday night, we'd have 50 sacks!
Smokey
8 years ago

Here’s an illustration of the SD OL using Packer players.

They break camp w/ Bulaga, Lang, Linsley, Sitton, Baktieri
Barclay, Rotheram, Gerhardt, Taylor, Walker

Rotheram and Taylor are cut and clear waivers [which Taylor would not] and signed to PS

Lang goes on IR; JD Walton is signed off street and Vujonivich who’d been though last 2 camps; but is on the street because no one signed him is signed.

At Monday night in Pittsburgh: Baktieri and Sitton are out; Bulaga and Linsley shift to guard so best 5 can play, left to right its: Walker, Bulaga, Gerhardt, Linsley, Barclay.

Then during the game Barclay goes out and Walker is moved to LT, so it’s: Vujonivich, Bulaga, Gerhardt, Linsley, Walker.

Then during the game Linsley goes out and he’s replaced by JD Walton, so its Vujonivich, Bulaga, Gerhardt, Walton, Walker.

If we played them Monday night, we'd have 50 sacks!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 





Say What ?

UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Chase Young to sign $13M contract with Saints
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Yosh to Panthers what noooo. Wait he didn't do crap
    wpr (18-Mar) : I say that he is technically HER BIL as he married her sister. I checked it out, he's considered my BIL as well. Sad.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : wpr, I assume its your BIL via marriage to your wife? If so, I can figure out where the smarts in the family went ;)
    wpr (18-Mar) : Mucky my B-I-L is Bare Stupid. I could write a book.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : As a teenager in Rockford IL I would get heckled by adults in public for wearing GB gear
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : if you think the online ones are bad, try *living amongst* them
    Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : Never doubt wprs loyalty. Poor guy is surrounded by Bears fans in Northern IL
    wpr (17-Mar) : pass Martha. Thanks for the invite though.
    Martha Careful (17-Mar) : blog * as the same ugly Illinois colors were adopted by the Baer
    Martha Careful (17-Mar) : WPR, perhaps you should be joining the Bears fans blog has the same ugly Illinois colors were adopted by the Bears
    Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : Ah a fellow U of Illinois hater. I can respect that though I imagine it's for different reasons
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : BTW. I didn't catch the game. I just hate Illinois.
    Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : They're your Big Ten Chumps and you will like it!
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : No, not for the record. Referee's handled that BS. Orange team was trash ass
    Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : *Your* Big Ten Chumps for the record
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : No, not Big Ten Champs. IL is big ten CHUMPS
    wpr (17-Mar) : Big Ten Champs
    wpr (17-Mar) : !!!
    wpr (17-Mar) : INI
    wpr (17-Mar) : ILL
    Martha Careful (17-Mar) : Wisconsin with an outstanding on in the men’s Big Ten basketball tournament. Let’s hope it continues in the NCAAs
    Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : Almost like taking QB in 2020 even if you don't need one is good move.
    Mucky Tundra (16-Mar) : 2021 QB Draft class looking like a real clunker
    Mucky Tundra (16-Mar) : A conditional 6th rounder? I remember Bears fans arguing they'd get a day 2 pick at worst lol
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : So I got the no extension part right and the have to wait on the CW physical wrong
    Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Bears are trading Justin Fields for a 2025 6th-round pick that goes to a 4th-round pick based on playtime, per sources.
    Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Former Packer Jarrett Bush opens Wisconsin’s first blow dry bar in Green Bay
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : If the Bears are not doing a deal with Washington, they also cannot trade Fields until Williams physical with them. All hail Caleb Williams!
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : The talent is undeniable, but the (advertised) haul is obscene.
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : If the Bears are cutting a deal with the Commanders, in either scenario, cannot happen until williams passes a Commanders physical
    dfosterf (16-Mar) : My guess is no to the Fields extension, but yes to the trade back with the Commanders.
    dhazer (15-Mar) : I think the Bears do a Love extension and they will trade out of the 1st pick and take the haul
    Martha Careful (15-Mar) : that might make sense
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Justin Fields to Steelers?
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Kenny Pickett. Eagles. Done.
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : They can claim best two WR tandem.
    Mucky Tundra (15-Mar) : Aaron Donald retiring
    dhazer (15-Mar) : Campbell signing with 49ers
    dhazer (15-Mar) : I love how the Bear Fans are now claiming they have the best skill players in the NFC North lol
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Vikings made a move to get a 2nd first round pick
    Mucky Tundra (15-Mar) : That's a not a bad deal for the Bears
    Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Bears have traded for WR Keenan Allen sending Chargers a fourth rounder.
    Martha Careful (15-Mar) : *signs
    Martha Careful (14-Mar) : MLB Devon White science with the Eagles
    Mucky Tundra (14-Mar) : But that was before FA started
    Mucky Tundra (14-Mar) : Dhaze, I thought Kurls would be their #1 target when I read that he was an Amos comp (jack of all trades guy)
    dhazer (14-Mar) : I would like to see the Packers target 2 more FA still available Kamren Curl Safety and Chase Young edge
    Martha Careful (14-Mar) : wow...didn't see that coming
    Zero2Cool (14-Mar) : AJ Dillon re-signing with Packers.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18-Mar / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    16-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    16-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    15-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

    15-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    14-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    14-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    14-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.