Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Saturday, March 1, 2014 9:36:56 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,352
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,751
Applause Received: 1,319

JerseyAl wrote:
The NFL announced the 2014 salary cap today at $133 million per team, up $10 million from last year's mark of $123 million. As part of the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement, teams can also carry over unspent cap dollars from the previous season.  The Green Bay Packers are expected to bring over an additional $9.98 million.  [...]


There has been speculation as to what the cap will be. Looks like it is set at $133 per team.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Sponsor
Offline yooperfan  
#2 Posted : Saturday, March 1, 2014 10:10:58 AM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,765
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 524
Applause Received: 243

So the Pack has 35 million in cap space.
Hmmmm.
Offline musccy  
#3 Posted : Sunday, March 2, 2014 8:31:41 AM(UTC)
musccy

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,933
Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania

Applause Given: 162
Applause Received: 149

Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
There has been speculation as to what the cap will be. Looks like it is set at $133 per team.


I don't really see this as a positive. It's a get out of jail free card for teams like the Cowboys and Denver who were reportedly in salary cap trouble.

It's also not like this information is escaping Sheilds, Finley, Jarius Byrd, Brian Orakpo, etc. and their agents. You think Rodgers got a big contract, wait until Luck is due and with another 15 or so mil in cap space than when A.R. was signed.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
nerdmann on 3/2/2014(UTC), wpr on 3/2/2014(UTC), beast on 3/2/2014(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#4 Posted : Sunday, March 2, 2014 8:49:07 AM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,240
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 203
Applause Received: 280

SIGN SHIELDS

FUCK
call me Dan
thanks Post received 1 applause.
buckeyepackfan on 3/2/2014(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#5 Posted : Sunday, March 2, 2014 1:10:57 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352

Well if this is the year, Ted actually is going to wade deeper into the FA pool. Than money can do nothing but help. Can allow either making more moves, or bigger moves, or using the extra space to front load more limiting how much of the future gets mortgaged.

Regardless of the amount of space there is, this is still the best possible year to throw our chips into the middle.
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
Offline wpr  
#6 Posted : Sunday, March 2, 2014 4:40:06 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,352
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,751
Applause Received: 1,319

Originally Posted by: musccy Go to Quoted Post
I don't really see this as a positive. It's a get out of jail free card for teams like the Cowboys and Denver who were reportedly in salary cap trouble.

It's also not like this information is escaping Sheilds, Finley, Jarius Byrd, Brian Orakpo, etc. and their agents. You think Rodgers got a big contract, wait until Luck is due and with another 15 or so mil in cap space than when A.R. was signed.


crossed my mind too.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Online sschind  
#7 Posted : Sunday, March 2, 2014 9:13:21 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 908
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 101
Applause Received: 388

Originally Posted by: musccy Go to Quoted Post
I don't really see this as a positive. It's a get out of jail free card for teams like the Cowboys and Denver who were reportedly in salary cap trouble.

It's also not like this information is escaping Sheilds, Finley, Jarius Byrd, Brian Orakpo, etc. and their agents. You think Rodgers got a big contract, wait until Luck is due and with another 15 or so mil in cap space than when A.R. was signed.


The cap was never set for 2014 was it. I thought the numbers given in the past were based on speculation. The cowboys and Broncos were in cap trouble when everyone thought the cap would be 125 million but as it turns out its not 125 its 133. Its not like teams knew the cap number for 2014, got in a bind and were bailed out when they raised it.

I know what you are saying but its not like it was raised to help those teams. Those teams just got lucky that it is higher than everyone initially thought. Their cap numbers were going to be what they were regardless of the salary cap total.

As far as future contracts go I think you will see guys like Luck really trying to cash in on their second contracts to make up for the huge deals they didn't get as rookies as well and the higher cap number will allow it to happen. At least for another decade or so until the last of the rookie jackpots are gone (Sam Bradford)
I respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
Offline musccy  
#8 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 7:55:53 AM(UTC)
musccy

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,933
Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania

Applause Given: 162
Applause Received: 149

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
The cap was never set for 2014 was it. I thought the numbers given in the past were based on speculation. The cowboys and Broncos were in cap trouble when everyone thought the cap would be 125 million but as it turns out its not 125 its 133. Its not like teams knew the cap number for 2014, got in a bind and were bailed out when they raised it.


As far as future contracts go I think you will see guys like Luck really trying to cash in on their second contracts to make up for the huge deals they didn't get as rookies as well and the higher cap number will allow it to happen. At least for another decade or so until the last of the rookie jackpots are gone (Sam Bradford)


I know Godell didn't see that "America's Team" was in trouble so he suddenly decided to bump the cap for them. I understand (or at least assume) the move was made independent of the knowledge of cap status of marquee teams. My comments were simply that I feel there's an excitement among NFL fans that this is a good thing, but again, it's just a gift to teams that didn't responsibly manage their numbers and almost an unintended punishment for teams that did.

Furthermore, we can pretty much delete the Shields 5 mil/year thread. There is no way he's settling for that now.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DakotaT on 3/3/2014(UTC)
Online nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 1:26:35 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,914
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,304
Applause Received: 577

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
The cap was never set for 2014 was it. I thought the numbers given in the past were based on speculation. The cowboys and Broncos were in cap trouble when everyone thought the cap would be 125 million but as it turns out its not 125 its 133. Its not like teams knew the cap number for 2014, got in a bind and were bailed out when they raised it.

I know what you are saying but its not like it was raised to help those teams. Those teams just got lucky that it is higher than everyone initially thought. Their cap numbers were going to be what they were regardless of the salary cap total.

As far as future contracts go I think you will see guys like Luck really trying to cash in on their second contracts to make up for the huge deals they didn't get as rookies as well and the higher cap number will allow it to happen. At least for another decade or so until the last of the rookie jackpots are gone (Sam Bradford)


If you don't think certain teams have additional influence due to their owners, you're wrong. Look at the Patriots. Robert Kraft takes over and suddenly they're a dynasty.

That said, the salary cap didn't expand the past few years, because De Smith borrowed against the future earnings to make his collective bargaining deal look better than it was. This was the first year the normal expansion of the cap came back online.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DakotaT  
#10 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 1:32:15 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,258
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 622
Applause Received: 1,299

Question now is will we be players in free agency this season, or just lock up our own guys like Nelson, Cobb, Finley etc.
UserPostedImage
Offline Wade  
#11 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 2:19:45 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,768
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 630
Applause Received: 648

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
Question now is will we be players in free agency this season, or just lock up our own guys like Nelson, Cobb, Finley etc.



hahahahaRolling On The Floor Laughing Rolling On The Floor Laughing Rolling On The Floor Laughing Rolling On The Floor Laughing Rolling On The Floor Laughing Rolling On The Floor Laughing

None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#12 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 2:23:13 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,668
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,845
Applause Received: 2,000

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
Question now is will we be players in free agency this season, or just lock up our own guys like Nelson, Cobb, Finley etc.


I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers land a starter out of Free Agency.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#13 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 3:16:56 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Posts: 2,533
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 224

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers land a starter out of Free Agency.


They certainly can and should - could and should even if the cap limit hadn't been raised, but like was said about Shields above, it will probably be a little bit more expensive now.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#14 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 8:56:02 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352

With our biggest contracts taken care of with Clay and Rodgers, and the amount of space we will have under the cap. It only makes sense to use it in FA. With the minimum cap requirements, we have to spend the money on somebody, or somebodies. Even with Nelson and Cobb coming due, I don't see current players that would justify being paid enough to eat up our cap space.

We can bring in a or a couple FA and be able to pay more in 1st year salary, rather than SB and do less harm to the teams future caps situation.

Edited by user Tuesday, March 4, 2014 7:28:06 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
Offline wpr  
#15 Posted : Monday, March 3, 2014 10:41:12 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,352
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,751
Applause Received: 1,319

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers land a starter out of Free Agency.


UserPostedImage
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

3h / Announcements / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

7h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mi_keys

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21h / Announcements / dfosterf

22h / Random Babble / MontanaBob


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.