Oh, forgot how you knew all the details. Glad you answered the questions.
Wait, you didn't because you can't. Either because you lack the comprehension of basic communication and/or tact to express it. Either way, you are the one looking like a jackass. 'Answering' my questions with obtuse, confusing, and plain incoherent responses won't get you far, bucko.
Originally Posted by: Formo
Continuing to put words in my mouth is only making you a jackass, buckwheat.
You want me to answer the questions he poses and I'm saying the questions arise from the multitude of inaccurate reports, because those reporting care not about accuracy but about being first on the 'breaking news'. Essentially, right back to my point of the author using the piss poor journalism in this country and leveraging brilliant wording to brainwash people thinking the many errant reports were FACTUAL reports, instead of being inaccurate shoot from the hip reports to get their article published first.
I really don't know how to make this more simple for you.
Shooting happens in school.
Reporters throw out anything they 'hear', claiming its from witnesses before verifying the information.
New reports come out after more information obtained.
Official report after confirmation of events while cross checking facts, etc...
Fella on the internet uses the multitude of flippant reports as facts that were retracted by Government and brainwashes weak minded folks who don't understand how to businesses try to monetize the internet.
Most people hate the Government, or at least dislike it strongly and don't trust it (no fault there) and that makes the aforementioned article more believable.
Does that make more sense? I ask because I care. I truly do not want people falling for this guy's manipulation. It really saddens me that people buy into that stuff. And I do not mean that in any negative connotation at all.