Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline macbob  
#1 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:04:18 PM(UTC)
macbob

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 288
Applause Received: 237



Packers.com wrote:


Super Bowl XLV Rings

It’s more than a Super Bowl ring. It’s a ring for the ages.

The four Super Bowl titles, the 13 world championships, the 92 years of franchise history, and the path taken by the 2010 Packers to add this chapter – it’s all in there. It tells an entire tale that marries the storied tradition of the Packers with their singular achievement in 2010.

All in a ring? Sure, and it was done majestically and subtly at the same time.

The ring’s square crest is highlighted by the ‘G’ logo – gold on a green setting, of course – but the overwhelming sparkle of the diamond-dominant presentation shouldn’t distract from all it incorporates.

In each of the four corners of the crest, surrounding the ‘G,’ is a marquis-cut diamond, which is appropriately football-shaped, just like the one on top of the Vince Lombardi trophy. There are four of those for I, II, XXXI and XLV, the four trophies that will reside together forever in the team’s Hall of Fame.

The shape of the ‘G’ itself consists of 13 diamonds, one for each title dating back to 1929, and surrounding the entire crown are 92 diamonds, one for each year the Packers have been in existence.

That’s a lot cleverly depicted on the ring’s face, but that’s not the whole story. The sides, or flanks, of the ring continue the convergence of history with the present.

On the one side that’s personalized for each player with his last name, there’s both an impressively carved image of Lambeau Field – a tribute to the best venue and fans in the NFL – and the player’s jersey number. Each number is circled, just like those on the third jerseys introduced this past year that represent the attire of the first title team in ’29.

On the other side, underneath a logo-lettering of “PACKERS,” is a Lombardi Trophy, with the name of the iconic coach, the NFL shield, and an ‘XLV’ at the base, which captures both the specific game and a piece of its logo.

Together, the primary images on the two flanks can be interpreted as the Lombardi Trophy being brought back to its home, Lambeau Field, which was done two days after the Super Bowl victory in North Texas in front of more than 56,000 fans who braved sub-zero weather to share in the glory.

There’s additional context when the ring is seen next to the Packers’ previous three. It appears to fit with the collection, while simultaneously standing out as the one that represents more history than the others. Each ring builds on the previous one, with the latest edition the culmination, for now.

The saga wouldn’t be complete without the “inside story” to the 2010 season, which is, fittingly, on the inside of the ring.

The Packers became just the third team to win three road playoff games en route to a Super Bowl title, and the scores of all the postseason contests are engraved inside the ring.

Also engraved inside are the numeral “1” along with the words “Mind, Goal, Purpose and Heart” – the very number and terms veteran cornerback Charles Woodson employed with such fervor in his memorable postgame locker-room speech following the NFC Championship in Chicago.

The number and its accompanying characteristics also reflect the unity the Packers needed to overcome numerous obstacles in their path to the championship – countless injuries, back-to-back overtime losses, and a season on the brink with two weeks to go.

As for the basics, the Super Bowl XLV rings are made of platinum, with 18-karat yellow gold, and weigh a little over 4 ounces. The diamonds total 3.35 carats.

The boring basics, however, hardly matter when attempting to absorb a much larger picture, and this ring paints an exquisitely detailed and symbolic image.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Online wpr  
#2 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:19:04 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,899
Applause Received: 1,407

It is nice to see so much history worked into the the rings. I am disappointed. The 92 small diamonds don't spell "backed in".Rolling Eyes
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Offline Kingkoopa  
#3 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:24:36 PM(UTC)
Kingkoopa

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/8/2009(UTC)

Applause Received: 2

Those rings are gorgeous!
blank
Offline Cheesey  
#4 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:53:29 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 172
Applause Received: 374

I dun do be wantin' me one of them there "bling blings!"
LOL!
(I'd even take a cubic zirconia one!!!)
UserPostedImage
Offline nerdmann  
#5 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:08:43 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,493
Applause Received: 624

Originally Posted by: Cheesey Go to Quoted Post
I dun do be wantin' me one of them there "bling blings!"
LOL!
(I'd even take a cubic zirconia one!!!)




Ha ha, they should sell imitations! Hell, I'd buy one. LOL.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline Wade  
#6 Posted : Friday, June 17, 2011 4:42:12 AM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 675

All in all, about what I expected. Sorry, but it's far too reminiscent of a bastard mating between a high school class ring and one of Mr T's pendants. And apart from the diamond solitaire (for a woman, obviously, a zillion diamonds just seems tacky and ostentatious to me.

A couple things I do like:
1. Platinum instead of gold.
2. The big G in the middle (even with the damn diamonds)
3. (and I really like this) The green highlighting the "G".That is major cool.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Offline Wade  
#7 Posted : Friday, June 17, 2011 4:49:11 AM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 675

Odd. I just found this at CNNSI.com. It say's its a photo of Aaron Rodgers' ring.

Sure looks more like gold than platinum. And not as cool as the other pictures.


Rodgers' ring
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Offline macbob  
#8 Posted : Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:18:02 PM(UTC)
macbob

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 288
Applause Received: 237

Originally Posted by: Wade Go to Quoted Post
Odd. I just found this at CNNSI.com. It say's its a photo of Aaron Rodgers' ring.

Sure looks more like gold than platinum. And not as cool as the other pictures.


Rodgers' ring


Think the photo you posted has poor lighting, etc. JSonline has a photo that looks like a similar/identical layout, but the colors, etc match the ones posted on Packers.com.

Here's the link to the JSonline photo.

http://www.jsonline.com/...s/packers/124050324.html
UserPostedImage
Offline Cheesey  
#9 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2011 10:35:48 AM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 172
Applause Received: 374

I like yellow gold better then platinum or white gold. The reason?
They look the same as if they were made out of plain silver.
UserPostedImage
Offline Yerko  
#10 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2011 2:06:38 PM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL

Applause Given: 143
Applause Received: 238

The rings are b-e-autiful and the fact that they hold that much story in them is amazing in itself. Wouldn't have know a small fact like "The shape of the ‘G’ itself consists of 13 diamonds, one for each title dating back to 1929, and surrounding the entire crown are 92 diamonds, one for each year the Packers have been in existence."

Awesome.
UserPostedImage
Offline MassPackersFan  
#11 Posted : Saturday, June 25, 2011 3:05:04 PM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7

One of my "sources" (heh) says that the rings cost $33,000 each.
UserPostedImage
Offline istanbulpacker  
#12 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2011 8:35:22 PM(UTC)
istanbulpacker

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7

I guess it is a product of the times, but I think there are a few too many chip diamonds in the thing. Today, everything has to be "blinged" out. Sorry, not my style. I like the Super Bowl II ring I believe it is. Like the 3 diamonds with the green background. I do like the green that they put into the background of the G logo on the new one as well as what looks like a thin gold outline.

I do like all the symbolism too. Looks like someone took the time to make it meaningful. I respect that they included tradition into the design. I just don't like all the diamonds. Looks kinda tacky. It is big enough anyway so people will surely notice it. It's not like you need to go to extra effort to put all the flash on it too. Just one man's opinion, though. Since I didn't play for the team thus had no say in the ring design, who cares. If this is what they players like, it is their memento.
blank
 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.481 seconds.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
7m / Random Babble / DakotaT

25m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

38m / Random Babble / wpr

55m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

57m / Random Babble / wpr

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / evad04

2h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

3h / Random Babble / dfosterf

3h / Around The NFL / Smokey

4h / Welcome to our Community! / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bozz_2006

6h / Random Babble / Wade


Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.