KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

Packers’ career sacks leaderboard changes after Pro Football Reference’s research
The title now unofficially belongs to Willie Davis, who takes over from Clay Matthews.

By Evan "Tex" Western@TexWestern Jul 12, 2021, 3:10pm CDT packers-career-sacks-leaderboard-changes-after-pro-football-references-research

1982 is the magic year for pass-rushing records in the NFL. That season, the league began counting sacks as an official statistic, helping give pass-rushers an easy metric with which people could judge how effective a player is and was at bringing down the quarterback.

The modern value of sacks may be debated, and Green Bay Packers outside linebackers coach Mike Smith would surely be happy to have a spirited discussion about the value of pressures vs. sacks at any time. But sacks remain the single easiest number by which to judge a pass-rusher’s production. As long as they played after 1982, at least.

But on Monday, Pro Football Reference published the results of painstaking research by a pair of football researchers into game film in an attempt to quantify sacks farther back into NFL history. These two individuals reviewed a multitude of official records to try to recreate and account for sacks dating back to the 1960 season. Click here for a thorough discussion on this research, which has shaken up many of the career and single-season sack leaderboards, both across the NFL as a whole and for teams with a storied history like the Packers.

In fact, the biggest result of this research as far as Green Bay is concerned is a change atop the unofficial career leaderboard. No longer can Clay Matthews reliably claim to be the Packers’ top sacker in franchise history, as that title now belongs to a Pro Football Hall of Famer who played several decades earlier.

Here is a look at a few of the names who now show up — or who significantly moved up — on the Packers’ leaderboard now that this data has been incorporated.

New #1: Willie Davis
Davis, a deserving Hall of Famer and member of the Hall’s All-1960s Team, takes over the Packers’ top spot in career sacks based on this research. Davis is credited with a total of 93.5 sacks from 1960 through 1969, reaching that number thanks to an impressive string of All-Pro seasons in the middle part of the decade.

Davis ripped off four straight double-digit sack seasons from 1964 to 1967, topping out at 14.5 in 1964. That also comes after a 13-sack season in 1962; he also earned first-team All-Pro honors for each of those five campaigns, four of which ended with the Packers winning the NFL Championship.

Ezra Johnson
Much of 1977 first-round draft pick Ezra Johnson’s career did have sacks counted after they became an official statistic in 1982, but his first five seasons in a Green Bay Packer did not get the credit that they deserved. In particular, Johnson’s 1978 season — which saw him earn his only trip to the Pro Bowl — goes down as the second-highest single-season sack total in franchise history with 17.5. That falls behind only Tim Harris’ 19.5 number from 1989.

Previously, Johnson was credited with only 41.5 sacks as a Packer and 55.5 overall for his career. Those numbers balloon up to 82 and 96 with his first five seasons counted, and his Packers totals put him in third place behind Davis and Clay Matthews (83.5).

Lionel Aldridge
The “other” defensive end on Vince Lombardi’s dominant mid-1960s teams was Aldridge, who played for the Packers from 1963 to 1971. Although Aldridge never made a Pro Bowl, he paired up with Davis to make for a fearsome tandem, as the two each posted double-digit sacks in 1965 and 1966 (10 and 12.5 for Aldridge in those two respective years).

His newly-recognized total of 62 sacks puts him in sixth place in Packers lore, following Kabeer Gbaja Biamila (74.5) and Reggie White (68.5) in 4th and 5th places.

Henry Jordan
Yes, the Lombardi Packers have a third defensive lineman on the franchise’s top ten list, with defensive tackle Henry Jordan getting in on the act. Like Davis, Jordan is a Hall of Famer, and PFREF credits him with 52 sacks during his Packers career from 1960 to 1969. He may even climb the rankings a bit more if there were any missed sacks from the 1960 season, as he was an All-Pro that year but currently shows no sacks.

Jordan’s five straight All-Pro nods speaks to the consistency of his play, as he earned those honors every year from 1960 to 1964. It’s nice to see at least one statistical measure that demonstrates how great he was on the interior of the line for over a decade.

How fitting that the lead is now in the hands of a complete player, a class act, and a success after is time in uniform.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Zero2Cool
2 years ago
Rewriting history. Not good.
UserPostedImage
earthquake
2 years ago

Rewriting history. Not good.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Personally, I see this more as accurately depicting history, as the date they started keeping track of "sacks" keeps many of the historically great players out of the record books/stats. It's not like a sack wasn't possible before 1982 or resulted from a change in the rules or something like that. Players had been racking up sacks since the beginning of the game - quite literally, making history - it's just that nobody was logging it at the time.

Now, I don't know how sound the method for counting stats pre-1982 is, and if they can accurately count sacks retroactively for every player that ever played (probably a tall order). But even still, it's an interesting reference point, and I think it's great that past players are getting recognition for their accomplishments. Heck, I just learned about 3 Packers players that I had never heard of, and likely would not have heard of had this research not been done.

In any case, history is not a static thing, historical records are frequently updated when new information is discovered, old records analyzed, etc.
blank
beast
2 years ago
Yeah, this isn't rewriting history... this is just adding history of before 1982.

A lot happened before 1982... I'm sure some of us were born before 1982! Them telling a story that happened before 1982 is actually history, assuming they get the facts correct.

Also, I believe I read somewhere that these are still being counted as unofficial stats, and that the official sacks only count of after 1982. But still it's nice to know...

Also, you hear about Vince Lombardi's offensive line all the time you don't usually hear about their defensive line but it sounds like they were quite dominant, especially in sacks in an era that had less passing.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2 years ago

Rewriting history. Not good.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Giving guys that played earlier the credit they deserve isn’t rewriting history.
Until the Titanic was found in 2 parts on the bottom of the ocean, it was believed that it went down in one piece. A few of the survivors said it snapped in half before it went down. But they were told they were wrong....but now we know they were right. Is updating the truth when facts are found rewriting history?
To me it’s just giving guys their due. How is that wrong? Or hurting current players?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago
Are they going to do the same for people like Deacon Jones?

Giving guys that played earlier the credit they deserve isn’t rewriting history.
Until the Titanic was found in 2 parts on the bottom of the ocean, it was believed that it went down in one piece. A few of the survivors said it snapped in half before it went down. But they were told they were wrong....but now we know they were right. Is updating the truth when facts are found rewriting history?
To me it’s just giving guys their due. How is that wrong? Or hurting current players?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



If holding a franchise record meant a lot to you only to have it taken away post-retirement by player(s) who played generations before you, initially, yeah, that would sting. In the end, I would be glad the franchise history books were more reflective of actual events.
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago

In the end, I would be glad the franchise history books were more reflective of actual events.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Just trying to clarify what you mean by this statement.

Are you saying your happy the history books added the sacks before 1982? (Which seems to go against everything else you're saying)

Or are you suggesting that sacks before 1982 were not actually events that happened?

Or is something else meant by that comment?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Just trying to clarify what you mean by this statement.

Are you saying your happy the history books added the sacks before 1982? (Which seems to go against everything else you're saying)

Or are you suggesting that sacks before 1982 were not actually events that happened?

Or is something else meant by that comment?

Originally Posted by: beast 



I think it's a bit hyperbolic to say "everything else you're saying" when I said maybe ~10 words in the previous post.

I'm absolutely down with history books being accurate. Unlike Alan's Titanic reference (was not applicable here at all lol), we could have done this at any point. Why was it done now? Why not ten, twenty years ago? Why sacks? What else are we considering on -- I'll say updating since rewriting put some of you in a tissy -- updating? When are we going to say the records are the records? Are the records in a constant state of flux? This isn't like the Titanic where people are wanting to know, but couldn't find the sunk ship. We have everything we need right now and we only lose more data/information each day. So, when does it end? When are records solidified? When is there no changing it? When can we look a record and confidently know -- that's it.

The defender tackling the QB is something that can easily be counted while watching tape. The trouble is not every game was filmed, nor has accurate written records. So, there will not be an absolute count like we can have post-1982. Are we okay with that? Am I? I don't see me losing sleep over it. It's a bummer that Clay and KGB got the feeling of being franchise leader and Willie Davis didn't. That part I don't care for. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad for his family, but I just think there might need to be a statue of limitations on record updating.

I believe Deacon Jones would probably have a different spot in history if all of his sacks were accrued. It was him who coined the term "sack".
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago
Why now? Because it wasn't done before!

Are the records in constant flux? Everything in life is in constant flux... but yes someone could break a record this coming season!

And more evidence or proof of something could come up... just like now they believe a certain type of dinosaur did survive after all, and we call that type of animals a bird. Are understanding and knowledge or lack there of is always changing


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Why now? Because it wasn't done before!

Are the records in constant flux? Everything in life is in constant flux... but yes someone could break a record this coming season!

And more evidence or proof of something could come up... just like now they believe a certain type of dinosaur did survive after all, and we call that type of animals a bird. Are understanding and knowledge or lack there of is always changing

Originally Posted by: beast 



You do realize how your comparison makes no sense whatsoever to this, right?

I just don't understand how people can be so cavalier about records changing -- have you never held the record something before? Do we not care or value such things anymore? Has the rampant clickbait headlines of needing to be entertained by "what's new" somehow diminished the value of history? It's not like something new was discovered. We have had the film since day one. Why now? Saying because it wasn't done before is an acknowledgement you have nothing to add. I question why now because, when does it stop? This isn't geology, this isn't about a ship at the bottom of the sea, this isn't Paleontology, this is simple statistics where we have accrued all of the information already and it's just sitting around. So, why does Clay Matthews III now get bumped from franchise leader in sacks? Who is next? Can any record holder feel accomplished with their place in the statistical history books? Hell, do we care? Maybe we're a people now that don't give two shits about the past and are perfectly fine with nothing being concrete?

I love history. I've watched more history documentaries and read more history books than history professors. I love DISCOVERING new history elements. This is not such a thing. This is not a new discovery. This is people (for some reason) choosing now to go back and tabulate sacks and update record books.

Again, I am very happy for Willie Davis, I wish he would have been alive for it. I just feel that with something simple like statistics that we have all of the information already, just get it done, get it as right as possible and don't try juxtaposing the numbers in the future. Let be what is done, let it be done. That's all.

But hey, all the damn records are going to be slaughtered in a year or two anyway with the NFL adding more games so the whole thing is moot. haha.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (13m) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (2h) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (3h) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (5h) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (7h) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (12h) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (12h) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (19h) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (19h) : *game plan
Martha Careful (19h) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (23h) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Went to a Titans board. One comment there. Not very long. I quote: "LOL" They don't sound overly upset about our aquisition.
beast (18-Apr) : OT Dillard has been absolutely horrible... like OG Newman levels
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Suit him up and have him stand in front of the big board as a draft day cautionary tale.
Zero2Cool (18-Apr) : Packers sign T Andre Dillard.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : Adds most of the information this time of year comes from agents.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : @RealAlexBarth Bill Belichick says accurate draft information doesn't leak from teams until about 12 hours before the draft. Adds most of th
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : I am very happy that for moment, Jordan Love seems like a normal human being
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Belichick * whatever
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "There's a lot of depth at Offensive Tackle and Wide Receiver." Bill Bellichick
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Thanks! I can't believe it's over haha
Martha Careful (16-Apr) : Congratulations
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Boom. Student Loan. $0.00. Only took about 20 years.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : Packers DT Kenny Clark: New defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley will 'allow us to be way more disruptive'
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Saints have agreed to terms on a contract with former Packers wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown.
beast (12-Apr) : No, but of it's for legislation, then half of the country will find it evil, not good, whatever it says....
Mucky Tundra (12-Apr) : Draft is still 2 weeks away. UGH
dhazer (11-Apr) : Does anyone know of a good AI generator to create letters of Support for legislation?
Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : Gordon "Red" Batty retires as equipment manager
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Sounds like that's pretty certain now.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Packers "at" Eagles in Brazil. Week One
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Va' Fazer As Malas Va' !
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy tipping us off?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Random Babble / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

21-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.